NexR2 vs 一 — price, size and safety, side by side
R2 (BNB Chain) vs 一 (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-15 / 2026-11-10.
R2 vs 一 — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-11-10T21:13:10
| R2 | 一 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.004594 | $0.0008793 |
| Market cap | $403.41K | $3.39M |
| 24h volume | $136.60K all venues | $35.26 DEX |
| Liquidity | $79.62K | $57.26K |
| FDV | $3.88M | $900.00K |
| Holders | 5,955 | 74,515 |
| Age (days) | 4 | 249 |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- 一 measures ~8.4× the market cap of R2
- R2 measures ~3,874× the 24h volume of 一
- 一 measures ~13× the holder count of R2
What the data says
R2
R² at 0x223a20e1b83aa3832e78d4b7b132df022e739222 is a four-day-old BNB Chain book — 4 days into its record at the November 6, 2026 snapshot — priced at a $403 thousand market cap against a $3.9 million fully-diluted figure on 1.0 billion units.
The launch tape is extreme even by BNB standards: $79.6 thousand of tracked depth on $4.1 million of 24-hour volume — the pool turning over dozens of times a day, the profile of a routed launch book. No holder distribution and no contract-level controls were assessed in this snapshot.
一
一 — the name is the Chinese character for "one" — at 0xef91c1eae97edcd429a5ad197753a6c3e4214444 is 249 days into a BNB Chain record, 74,515 wallets holding a $3.4 million book at the November 5, 2026 snapshot.
The snapshot's rare quality is in the spread: the ten largest wallets hold about 9.8% of supply — the broadest top-10 distribution in this batch by a distance — while the creator wallet holds under 0.01%. The contract cannot mint new supply and cannot pause or blacklist transfers, and its source is verified. The flagged item is modest liquidity: $57 thousand of tracked depth against a roughly $1.5-million daily tape — workable, but thin enough that size moves the price.
FAQ
Which is bigger, R2 or 一?
By tracked market cap: R2 (BNB Chain) measures $403.41K and 一 (BNB Chain) measures $3.39M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, R2 or 一?
On the contract checks we publish: R2 (BNB Chain) grades B and 一 (BNB Chain) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have R2 and 一 performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-11-10T21:13:10, the measured snapshots show R2 at −82.5% and 一 at −79.3%.
More comparisons
USDE vs R2R2 vs LINK.EWLD vs R2R2 vs UNI一 vs TSATUNI vs 一一 vs POLLINK.E vs 一
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-11-10T21:13:10; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.