NexR2 vs BTG — price, size and safety, side by side
R2 (BNB Chain) vs BTG (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-15 / 2026-11-11.
R2 vs BTG — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-11-10T21:13:10
| R2 | BTG | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.004594 | $0.6147 |
| Market cap | $403.41K | $1.34M |
| 24h volume | $136.60K all venues | $404.09K all venues |
| Liquidity | $79.62K | $63.88K |
| FDV | $3.88M | $14.06M |
| Holders | 5,955 | 64,175 |
| Age (days) | 4 | 374 |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- BTG measures ~3.3× the market cap of R2
- BTG measures ~3.0× the 24h volume of R2
- BTG measures ~11× the holder count of R2
- over the shared window R2 moved −51.0% while BTG moved −33.3%
What the data says
R2
R² at 0x223a20e1b83aa3832e78d4b7b132df022e739222 is a four-day-old BNB Chain book — 4 days into its record at the November 6, 2026 snapshot — priced at a $403 thousand market cap against a $3.9 million fully-diluted figure on 1.0 billion units.
The launch tape is extreme even by BNB standards: $79.6 thousand of tracked depth on $4.1 million of 24-hour volume — the pool turning over dozens of times a day, the profile of a routed launch book. No holder distribution and no contract-level controls were assessed in this snapshot.
BTG
Start with the good news — BTG's contract is clean on the risks that matter. The contract can't create new tokens — the supply is capped for good, and it can't pause transfers or blacklist wallets either, so your tokens stay yours to move and sell. Neither lever existing is the main reason BTG's 92/100 comes down to market factors, not contract ones (2026-10-09).
On liquidity and holders, BTG shows $65.16K of on-chain liquidity, 64,175 wallets holding and an established record at 374 days as of 2026-10-09. The $65.16K pool against a ~$1.75M cap is a middling ratio — enough for typical trades to clear, but worth respecting if you're trading size. The 64,175-wallet base is a reasonable spread of ownership, though a headline count doesn't show whether a few wallets dominate — the concentration read on this page speaks to that. The creator's own position is small — <0.01% of supply as of 2026-10-09, comfortably under the 5% line the scanners flag — which is what you want to see.
FAQ
Which is bigger, R2 or BTG?
By tracked market cap: R2 (BNB Chain) measures $403.41K and BTG (BNB Chain) measures $1.34M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, R2 or BTG?
On the contract checks we publish: R2 (BNB Chain) grades B and BTG (BNB Chain) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have R2 and BTG performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-11-10T21:13:10, the measured snapshots show R2 at −51.0% and BTG at −33.3%.
More comparisons
USDE vs R2R2 vs LINK.EWLD vs R2R2 vs UNIUNI vs BTGLINK.E vs BTGBTG vs TSATBTG vs POL
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-11-10T21:13:10; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.