HostR2 vs 果蝇 — price, size and safety, side by side
R2 (BNB Chain) vs 果蝇 (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-26.
R2 vs 果蝇 — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| R2 | 果蝇 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.008519 | $0.0007154 |
| Market cap | $1.78M | $438.50K |
| 24h volume | $4.11M | $986.53K |
| Liquidity | $124.34K | $83.02K |
| FDV | $17.07M | $715.42K |
| Holders | 5,955 | 7,706 |
| Age (days) | 4 | 6 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- R2 measures ~4.0× the market cap of 果蝇
- R2 measures ~4.2× the 24h volume of 果蝇
- over the shared window R2 moved −50.1% while 果蝇 moved −35.6%
What the data says
R2
R² at 0x223a20e1b83aa3832e78d4b7b132df022e739222 is a four-day-old BNB Chain book — 4 days into its record at the September 26, 2026 snapshot — priced at a $1.8 million market cap against a $17.1 million fully-diluted figure on 1.0 billion units.
The launch tape is extreme even by BNB standards: $124.3 thousand of tracked depth on $4.1 million of 24-hour volume — the pool turning over dozens of times a day, the profile of a routed launch book. No holder distribution and no contract-level controls were assessed in this snapshot.
果蝇
永生果蝇 — "immortal fruit fly" — at 0x2b90bb9683383b6a1440e116309ba0187ef67777 is a six-day-old BNB Chain book with $83.0 thousand of workable tracked depth at the September 26, 2026 snapshot, on a 1.0 billion supply.
The measured shape is unusual for a week-old book: 7,706 holders with the top-ten wallets holding 18.3 percent of supply, on $986.5 thousand of 24-hour volume — a distributed launch with real tape. Contract controls were measured: the mint authority is revoked; the freeze authority is revoked; and the deployed code is not a proxy — the contract as deployed is the contract as it stays.
FAQ
Which is bigger, R2 or 果蝇?
By tracked market cap: R2 (BNB Chain) measures $1.78M and 果蝇 (BNB Chain) measures $438.50K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, R2 or 果蝇?
On the contract checks we publish: R2 (BNB Chain) grades B and 果蝇 (BNB Chain) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have R2 and 果蝇 performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show R2 at −50.1% and 果蝇 at −35.6%.
More comparisons
URA vs R2MASK vs R2R2 vs TREMPDUPE vs R2RDDT vs 果蝇UWU vs 果蝇GTA 6 COIN vs 果蝇果蝇 vs LMT
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.