NexQUID vs ZRO — price, size and safety, side by side
QUID (Base) vs ZRO (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-12 / 2026-11-15.
QUID vs ZRO — normalized performance, 2026-09-26 to 2026-11-12T21:16:22
| QUID | ZRO | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.05013 | $1.38 |
| Market cap | $8.12M | $746.87M |
| 24h volume | $3.73M all venues | $85.18M all venues |
| Liquidity | $407.70K | $339.39K |
| FDV | $56.74M | $11.37M |
| Holders | 14,990 | 448,955 |
| Age (days) | 16 | 176 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- ZRO measures ~92× the market cap of QUID
- ZRO measures ~23× the 24h volume of QUID
- ZRO measures ~30× the holder count of QUID
- over the shared window QUID moved −22.4% while ZRO moved +30.9%
What the data says
QUID
QUID — trading as "Squid" on Base, 0x1a44233fae8d50f1aeb3a5d58dd426ff4814cb53 — carries the single most infamous name in token history. The original SQUID, launched around the Squid Game series in late 2021, became the canonical honeypot: it rocketed thousands of percent while its contract quietly blocked every sell, then collapsed to zero in minutes when the deployer exited.
This contract is not that token — different chain, different address, 16 days tracked in the November 6, 2026 snapshot with $408 thousand of liquidity and roughly $14.4 million of daily volume. But the name choice is itself a data point: a deployer who picks the most famous scam ticker in crypto is either making an ironic joke or fishing for exactly the buyers the joke attracts. Neither possibility says the contract is malicious — the sell-side check is what settles that, and the honeypot test is the required first step on this page more than almost any other.
ZRO
ZRO at 0x6985884c4392d348587b19cb9eaaf157f13271cd — LayerZero — is the Base deployment, 158 days into its record at the November 6, 2026 snapshot and carrying a byte-identical address to the Optimism one — the same omnichain contract deployed deterministically on each chain. The asset-wide $746.9 million market cap towers over the $11.4 million fully-diluted figure on 6.1 million local units.
The local book is thin for the headline but the tape is the liveliest of the ZRO books: $339.4 thousand of tracked depth on $912.0 thousand of 24-hour volume — turnover three times the pool daily. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, QUID or ZRO?
By tracked market cap: QUID (Base) measures $8.12M and ZRO (Base) measures $746.87M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, QUID or ZRO?
On the contract checks we publish: QUID (Base) grades A and ZRO (Base) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have QUID and ZRO performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-26 and 2026-11-12T21:16:22, the measured snapshots show QUID at −22.4% and ZRO at +30.9%.
More comparisons
MON vs QUIDPYTH vs QUIDQUID vs CRVSTABLE vs QUIDCRV vs ZROZRO vs GOHOMEZRO vs VIRTUALMON vs ZRO
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-26→2026-11-12T21:16:22; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.