NexQUID vs EUSD — price, size and safety, side by side
QUID (Base) vs EUSD (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-12 / 2026-11-09.
QUID vs EUSD — normalized performance, 2026-10-06 to 2026-11-07T18:16:33
| QUID | EUSD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.05013 | $0.9977 |
| Market cap | $8.12M | $24.49M |
| 24h volume | $3.73M all venues | $107.84K all venues |
| Liquidity | $407.70K | $392.30K |
| FDV | $56.74M | $18.57M |
| Holders | 14,990 | 25,072 |
| Age (days) | 16 | 853 |
| Safety grade | A | C |
Where they differ
- EUSD measures ~3.0× the market cap of QUID
- QUID measures ~35× the 24h volume of EUSD
- EUSD measures ~1.7× the holder count of QUID
- over the shared window QUID moved −9.78% while EUSD moved +0.10%
What the data says
QUID
QUID — trading as "Squid" on Base, 0x1a44233fae8d50f1aeb3a5d58dd426ff4814cb53 — carries the single most infamous name in token history. The original SQUID, launched around the Squid Game series in late 2021, became the canonical honeypot: it rocketed thousands of percent while its contract quietly blocked every sell, then collapsed to zero in minutes when the deployer exited.
This contract is not that token — different chain, different address, 16 days tracked in the November 6, 2026 snapshot with $408 thousand of liquidity and roughly $14.4 million of daily volume. But the name choice is itself a data point: a deployer who picks the most famous scam ticker in crypto is either making an ironic joke or fishing for exactly the buyers the joke attracts. Neither possibility says the contract is malicious — the sell-side check is what settles that, and the honeypot test is the required first step on this page more than almost any other.
EUSD
Before the market numbers, there's a contract detail on EUSD to flag. The mint function on EUSD's contract is still live as of 2026-10-09, which keeps the option open for them to create new supply. Read the rest of the page with that in mind — it's why EUSD is at C (55/100) as of 2026-10-09, with real room to improve.
On liquidity and holders, EUSD shows $1.10M of on-chain liquidity, 25,072 holders and 853 days old as of 2026-10-09. Set the $1.10M of depth beside roughly $23.35M in market cap and it reads as moderate: comfortable for everyday trades, less so for size that begins to rival the pool itself. A 25,072-holder base is a fair start, but distribution matters more than the count — check how much sits in the largest wallets before leaning on it. The creator's own position is small — <0.01% of supply as of 2026-10-09, comfortably under the 5% line the scanners flag — which is what you want to see.
FAQ
Which is bigger, QUID or EUSD?
By tracked market cap: QUID (Base) measures $8.12M and EUSD (Base) measures $24.49M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, QUID or EUSD?
On the contract checks we publish: QUID (Base) grades A and EUSD (Base) grades C. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have QUID and EUSD performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-06 and 2026-11-07T18:16:33, the measured snapshots show QUID at −9.78% and EUSD at +0.10%.
More comparisons
MON vs QUIDPYTH vs QUIDQUID vs CRVSTABLE vs QUIDMON vs EUSDPYTH vs EUSDEUSD vs CRVEUSD vs GOHOME
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-06→2026-11-07T18:16:33; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.