NexQUID vs CHIP — price, size and safety, side by side
QUID (Base) vs CHIP (Arbitrum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-12 / 2026-11-15.
QUID vs CHIP — normalized performance, 2026-08-19 to 2026-11-12T21:16:22
| QUID | CHIP | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.05013 | $0.027 |
| Market cap | $8.12M | $73.99M |
| 24h volume | $3.73M all venues | $11.10M all venues |
| Liquidity | $407.70K | $1.31M |
| FDV | $56.74M | $369.95M |
| Holders | 14,990 | 5,669 |
| Age (days) | 16 | 171 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- CHIP measures ~9.1× the market cap of QUID
- CHIP measures ~3.2× the liquidity of QUID
- CHIP measures ~3.0× the 24h volume of QUID
- QUID measures ~2.6× the holder count of CHIP
- over the shared window QUID moved −22.4% while CHIP moved −33.2%
What the data says
QUID
QUID — trading as "Squid" on Base, 0x1a44233fae8d50f1aeb3a5d58dd426ff4814cb53 — carries the single most infamous name in token history. The original SQUID, launched around the Squid Game series in late 2021, became the canonical honeypot: it rocketed thousands of percent while its contract quietly blocked every sell, then collapsed to zero in minutes when the deployer exited.
This contract is not that token — different chain, different address, 16 days tracked in the November 6, 2026 snapshot with $408 thousand of liquidity and roughly $14.4 million of daily volume. But the name choice is itself a data point: a deployer who picks the most famous scam ticker in crypto is either making an ironic joke or fishing for exactly the buyers the joke attracts. Neither possibility says the contract is malicious — the sell-side check is what settles that, and the honeypot test is the required first step on this page more than almost any other.
CHIP
CHIP is a mid-cap token on Arbitrum: the contract 0x0c1c1c109fe34733fca54b82d7b46b75cfb71f6e is what our scan tracks, with $1.3 million of pool liquidity as of November 6, 2026 — the deepest pool in this batch's EVM tier.
Same verifiability note as the rest of this tier: the liquidity figure is a real on-chain fact and a functional market, but it is not a credential — CHIP-tickered tokens exist on several chains, so confirm this contract is the project you mean to hold before trading. Deep pool, ordinary verification burden.
FAQ
Which is bigger, QUID or CHIP?
By tracked market cap: QUID (Base) measures $8.12M and CHIP (Arbitrum) measures $73.99M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, QUID or CHIP?
On the contract checks we publish: QUID (Base) grades A and CHIP (Arbitrum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have QUID and CHIP performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-08-19 and 2026-11-12T21:16:22, the measured snapshots show QUID at −22.4% and CHIP at −33.2%.
More comparisons
MON vs QUIDPYTH vs QUIDQUID vs CRVSTABLE vs QUIDCHIP vs QNTONDO vs CHIPMORPHO vs CHIPCHIP vs LIT
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-08-19→2026-11-12T21:16:22; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.