HostQUEST vs HOOPX — price, size and safety, side by side
QUEST (Solana) vs HOOPX (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-31 / 2026-10-31.
QUEST vs HOOPX — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-10-31T21:16:17
| QUEST | HOOPX | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.002897 | $0.0001279 |
| Market cap | $1.88M | $266.04K |
| 24h volume | $9.57K DEX | $734.15 DEX |
| Liquidity | $64.10K | $63.31K |
| FDV | $38.53M | $266.04K |
| Holders | 7,192 | 973 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- QUEST measures ~7.1× the market cap of HOOPX
- QUEST measures ~13× the 24h volume of HOOPX
- QUEST measures ~7.4× the holder count of HOOPX
- over the shared window QUEST moved −80.3% while HOOPX moved −58.4%
What the data says
QUEST
Critters Quest — QUEST — the token of a Solana NFT/game collection — at the vanity mint QUESTP8xKMfot3ErcdfWXsHbG3kN9mutieAqrVNw74s. The October 6, 2026 snapshot shows about $64 thousand of liquidity and roughly 7,192 holders.
Game-adjacent tokens have a standard honest framing: the value case is whether the game itself retains players — everything else (tokenomics, yield mechanics) is secondary to whether people keep playing. Critters Quest has a real collection and a surviving holder community; whether the game loop delivers durable demand is the off-chain fact that decides it.
HOOPX
HOOPX — a Solana community token at mint 9GhjesUhxmVo9x4UHpdS6NVi4TGzcx8BtGckUqFrjupx. The October 6, 2026 snapshot shows about $63 thousand of liquidity and roughly 973 holders.
973 holders under a $63 thousand pool is concentrated — a small registry effectively sets the price. Standard community-token economics.
FAQ
Which is bigger, QUEST or HOOPX?
By tracked market cap: QUEST (Solana) measures $1.88M and HOOPX (Solana) measures $266.04K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, QUEST or HOOPX?
On the contract checks we publish: QUEST (Solana) grades A and HOOPX (Solana) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have QUEST and HOOPX performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-10-31T21:16:17, the measured snapshots show QUEST at −80.3% and HOOPX at −58.4%.
More comparisons
USDE vs QUESTQUEST vs TSATUNI vs QUESTQUEST vs POLHOOPX vs TSATUSDE vs HOOPXUNI vs HOOPXHOOPX vs POL
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-10-31T21:16:17; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.