NexQQQB vs 79AU — price, size and safety, side by side
QQQB (BNB Chain) vs 79AU (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-11 / 2026-11-15.
QQQB vs 79AU — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-11-11T18:19:14
| QQQB | 79AU | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $694.70 | $5.03 |
| Market cap | $1.29M | — |
| 24h volume | $67.11M all venues | $1.39M DEX |
| Liquidity | $8.07M | $5.03M |
| FDV | $116.06M | $1.18B |
| Holders | 312,449 | 41,285 |
| Age (days) | 91 | 132 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- QQQB measures ~1.6× the liquidity of 79AU
- QQQB measures ~48× the 24h volume of 79AU
- QQQB measures ~7.6× the holder count of 79AU
What the data says
QQQB
QQQB at 0x205812cdbed920aff76c6580abd681a46d11efc7 — deployed as "Invesqo QQQ" — is a very young BNB Chain asset: 73 days into its record at the November 6, 2026 snapshot. The name borrows the shape of a well-known index ticker; nothing in the measured data says what it tracks, so the name is a label, not a description.
The numbers contradict each other in instructive ways: a $1.3 million market cap on 78.3 thousand units against a $116.1 million fully-diluted figure — a float that is a sliver of the total supply — while $8.1 million of deep tracked depth outweighs the entire cap and the $8.3 million daily volume nearly matches the pool. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
79AU
79AU at 0xc35ef0564751a27b468f791113c686c8eebaa9ca is a 114-day-old BNB Chain book priced at a $1.2 billion cap on $5.0 million of tracked liquidity, 41,285 wallets holding at the November 5, 2026 snapshot.
Three reads belong together here. The pool is workable — the deepest in this batch — but thin against the cap's own size. The contract takes a 2.99% tax on every sale, so a round trip costs close to 6% before slippage. And the ten largest wallets hold about 96.8% of supply: a float that concentrated means the cap's moves are steered by very few hands, whatever the holder count says.
FAQ
Which is bigger, QQQB or 79AU?
By tracked market cap: QQQB (BNB Chain) measures $1.29M and 79AU (BNB Chain) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, QQQB or 79AU?
On the contract checks we publish: QQQB (BNB Chain) grades B and 79AU (BNB Chain) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have QQQB and 79AU performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-11-11T18:19:14, the measured snapshots show QQQB at −4.44% and 79AU at −2.16%.
More comparisons
QQQB vs SKYQQQB vs KBTCQQQB vs USDCSUSDAI vs QQQB79AU vs JLP79AU vs LBTC79AU vs JUPSPX vs 79AU
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-11-11T18:19:14; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.