HostQI vs PNG — price, size and safety, side by side
QI (Avalanche) vs PNG (Avalanche) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
QI vs PNG — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-27T15:10:18
| QI | PNG | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.003043 | $0.03249 |
| Market cap | $21.91M | $7.74M |
| 24h volume | $329.99K | $137.66K |
| Liquidity | $252.82K | $206.00K |
| FDV | $21.91M | $17.46M |
| Holders | 39,637 | 38,771 |
| Age (days) | 1,820 | 1,856 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- QI measures ~2.8× the market cap of PNG
- QI measures ~2.4× the 24h volume of PNG
- over the shared window QI moved +116% while PNG moved +12.7%
What the data says
QI
QI at 0x8729438eb15e2c8b576fcc6aecda6a148776c0f5 is BENQI's governance token — Avalanche's original money-market protocol — 1,820 days into its record at the September 27, 2026 snapshot and priced at a $21.9 million market cap across a 7.2 billion supply.
The book is workable and the tape alive five years in: $252.8 thousand of tracked depth on $45.8 thousand of 24-hour volume — a real protocol-token pool, not a listing stub. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
PNG
PNG at 0x60781c2586d68229fde47564546784ab3faca982 is Pangolin's DEX token — the governance asset of one of Avalanche's original community exchanges, 1,856 days into its record and one of the longest-tracked deployments in this index. The September 27, 2026 snapshot counts 38,771 holders around a $7.7 million market cap, with a $17.5 million fully-diluted figure on 538.0 million units showing the emission still ahead.
The contract posture is the clean kind this index prints: mint and freeze authority are both revoked, the contract cannot create new supply, and it is not a proxy — the locked set that earns the grade. The holder book is broader than the cap suggests — the ten largest wallets hold 85.2% of supply, the treasury-heavy shape of a launch-era DEX token — and $206.0 thousand of workable depth sees $122.1 thousand of daily volume.
FAQ
Which is bigger, QI or PNG?
By tracked market cap: QI (Avalanche) measures $21.91M and PNG (Avalanche) measures $7.74M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, QI or PNG?
On the contract checks we publish: QI (Avalanche) grades A and PNG (Avalanche) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have QI and PNG performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-27T15:10:18, the measured snapshots show QI at +116% and PNG at +12.7%.
More comparisons
QI vs STRCXCYBERLEEK vs QIQI vs AAVE.ENODAL vs QIPNG vs RHEAPNG vs BILLYPNG vs CLASHSC vs PNG
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-27T15:10:18; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.