Open app

Q vs ON — price, size and safety, side by side

Q (BNB Chain) vs ON (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-11 / 2026-11-10.

QB

$0.02898
Quack AI Token on BNB Chain
Trade Q
vs

ONA

$0.1076
Orochi Network Token on BNB Chain
Trade ON

Q vs ON — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-11-10T21:13:10

100 — shared start
Q −3.90%  ·  ON −27.2% — both series rebased to 100 at the first measured point in the shared window; not a raw-price chart.
QON
Price$0.02898$0.1076
Market cap$143.35M$23.64M
24h volume$12.10M all venues$8.81M all venues
Liquidity$432.02K$409.56K
FDV$146.35M$16.39M
Holders19,1902,730
Age (days)404334
Safety gradeBA

Where they differ

What the data says

Q

Q at 0xc07e1300dc138601fa6b0b59f8d0fa477e690589 — Quack AI Token — is a 386-day-old BNB Chain book priced at a $143.4 million asset-wide market cap against a $146.4 million fully-diluted figure on 5.0 billion units at the November 6, 2026 snapshot.

The local book is thin for the headline and the tape is hot: $432.0 thousand of tracked depth on $3.0 million of 24-hour volume — routed flow cycling the pool eight times daily. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.

ON

ON at 0x0e4f6209ed984b21edea43ace6e09559ed051d48 — Orochi Network Token — is a 334-day-old BNB Chain book priced at a $23.6 million market cap against a $16.4 million fully-diluted figure on 100.0 million units at the November 6, 2026 snapshot.

The book is workable and the tape is working: $409.6 thousand of tracked depth on $986.4 thousand of 24-hour volume. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.

FAQ

Which is bigger, Q or ON?

By tracked market cap: Q (BNB Chain) measures $143.35M and ON (BNB Chain) measures $23.64M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.

Which is safer, Q or ON?

On the contract checks we publish: Q (BNB Chain) grades B and ON (BNB Chain) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.

How have Q and ON performed over the shared window?

Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-11-10T21:13:10, the measured snapshots show Q at −3.90% and ON at −27.2%.

More comparisons

PYTH vs QQ vs MONSTABLE vs QQ vs CRVMON vs ONPYTH vs ONON vs CRVSTABLE vs ON

The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-11-10T21:13:10; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.

Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.