NexPTB vs 果蝇 — price, size and safety, side by side
PTB (BNB Chain) vs 果蝇 (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-10 / 2026-11-09.
PTB vs 果蝇 — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-11-09T21:16:00
| PTB | 果蝇 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.00002095 | $0.000000000000 |
| Market cap | $52.59K | $7.83K |
| 24h volume | $2.03M all venues | $0.00 DEX |
| Liquidity | $8.03K | $5.51 |
| FDV | $32.14K | $7.72K |
| Holders | 34,686 | 1,815,204 |
| Age (days) | 384 | 5 |
| Safety grade | D | B |
Where they differ
- PTB measures ~6.7× the market cap of 果蝇
- PTB measures ~1,459× the liquidity of 果蝇
- 果蝇 measures ~52× the holder count of PTB
What the data says
PTB
PTB at 0x95c9b514566fbd224dc2037f5914eb8ab91c9201 — Portal To Bitcoin — is a 384-day-old BNB Chain book priced at a $53 thousand asset-wide market cap against a $32 thousand fully-diluted figure on 1.1 billion local units at the November 4, 2026 snapshot.
The shape here is the tape: $8.0 thousand of workable depth against $1.6 million of 24-hour volume — turnover approaching forty times the pool daily, one of the busiest churn profiles in the tracked set. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
果蝇
果蝇 — "fruit fly" in Chinese — at 0x209e487f1c2637ddf1f1b3f7d88a19068626b70b is a five-day-old BNB Chain deployment whose headline number demands a second look: 1,815,204 recorded wallets against a market cap of $7.8 thousand and a fully diluted figure of $8 thousand on the November 3, 2026 snapshot.
A holder count that large against a four-figure valuation is the signature of an airdrop-shaped distribution — dust scattered across hundreds of thousands of addresses, not organic demand — and the concentration read agrees: the top ten wallets hold 100% of the supply, so the 1.8 million "holders" carry amounts too small to matter. The tracked book, $5.5 of pool liquidity, is real but thin against the FDV.
FAQ
Which is bigger, PTB or 果蝇?
By tracked market cap: PTB (BNB Chain) measures $52.59K and 果蝇 (BNB Chain) measures $7.83K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, PTB or 果蝇?
On the contract checks we publish: PTB (BNB Chain) grades D and 果蝇 (BNB Chain) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have PTB and 果蝇 performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-11-09T21:16:00, the measured snapshots show PTB at −98.1% and 果蝇 at −100.0%.
More comparisons
PTB vs WEETHPTB vs RETHCAKE vs PTBPTB vs NODA果蝇 vs BNSOL果蝇 vs JITOSOL果蝇 vs JLUSDC果蝇 vs JUPSOL
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-11-09T21:16:00; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.