HostPST vs BTC.B — price, size and safety, side by side
PST (Solana) vs BTC.B (Avalanche) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
PST vs BTC.B — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-27T15:10:18
| PST | BTC.B | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.14 | $84.44K |
| Market cap | $383.37M | $169.49M |
| 24h volume | $1.15M | $6.13M |
| Liquidity | $3.78M | $3.72M |
| FDV | $383.37M | $169.49M |
| Holders | 4,155 | 170,452 |
| Age (days) | — | 343 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- PST measures ~2.3× the market cap of BTC.B
- BTC.B measures ~5.3× the 24h volume of PST
- BTC.B measures ~41× the holder count of PST
What the data says
PST
PST is PayFi's strategy token — a USDC-denominated position that routes deposits into payment-finance yield (the spread on moving money across borders and settlement rails), another real-world-cashflow token in the RWA mold. The mint 59obFNBzyTBGowrkif5uK7ojS58vsuWz3ZCvg6tfZAGw is the Solana deployment; our September 26, 2026 snapshot reads $3.8 million of tracked pool liquidity and grades it A.
The honest mechanics: payment-finance yield is real commercial activity — remittance float, settlement timing spreads — so PST's return isn't printed from token emissions; it's also an off-chain book the chain can't verify, and the token is ultimately a claim on PayFi's operation of that book. The A grade is a contract verdict; the strategy is a counterparty.
BTC.B
BTC.b at 0x152b9d0fdc40c096757f570a51e494bd4b943e50 is the Avalanche Bridge's wrapped-bitcoin claim — the contract literally named "Bitcoin" on this chain, which is exactly why the address matters: the most borrowed name in crypto proves nothing without the mint string behind it.
The September 27, 2026 snapshot prices a $169.5 million market cap on a local supply of 2.0 thousand units — real size for a chain-level book. $3.7 million of tracked depth is workable for that float, and $7.1 million of 24-hour volume is the liveliest tape in this Avalanche batch — a bridged-BTC book that actually turns over, 343 days into its record.
FAQ
Which is bigger, PST or BTC.B?
By tracked market cap: PST (Solana) measures $383.37M and BTC.B (Avalanche) measures $169.49M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, PST or BTC.B?
On the contract checks we publish: PST (Solana) grades A and BTC.B (Avalanche) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have PST and BTC.B performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-27T15:10:18, the measured snapshots show PST at +0.15% and BTC.B at +0.57%.
More comparisons
WSTETH vs PSTPNUT vs PSTWSTETH vs PSTAIPF vs PSTBTC.B vs NAPBTC.B vs ENABTC.B vs XRPWSTETH vs BTC.B
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-27T15:10:18; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.