NexPOWER vs ZAMA — price, size and safety, side by side
POWER (BNB Chain) vs ZAMA (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-10 / 2026-11-11.
POWER vs ZAMA — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-11-10T21:13:10
| POWER | ZAMA | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.06312 | $0.06587 |
| Market cap | $14.73M | $180.16M |
| 24h volume | $1.65M all venues | $10.54M all venues |
| Liquidity | $378.29K | $346.11K |
| FDV | $3.94M | $16.71M |
| Holders | 3,914 | 3,540 |
| Age (days) | 291 | 234 |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- ZAMA measures ~12× the market cap of POWER
- ZAMA measures ~6.4× the 24h volume of POWER
- over the shared window POWER moved −48.8% while ZAMA moved −33.9%
What the data says
POWER
POWER at 0x9dc44ae5be187eca9e2a67e33f27a4c91cea1223 is a BNB Chain asset 291 days into its record at the November 6, 2026 snapshot. The asset-wide $14.7 million market cap sits above the $3.9 million fully-diluted figure priced on 52.9 million local units — most of the headline float trades elsewhere.
The local book is workable and the tape is hot: $378.3 thousand of tracked depth on $1.4 million of 24-hour volume — the pool cycling itself three times a day, a routed-flow book rather than a sitting one. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
ZAMA
ZAMA at 0x6907a5986c4950bdaf2f81828ec0737ce787519f is a 234-day-old BNB Chain book priced at a $180.2 million asset-wide market cap against a $16.7 million fully-diluted figure priced on 230.5 million local units at the November 6, 2026 snapshot.
The local book is thin for the headline and the tape is the busiest in this set: $346.1 thousand of tracked depth on $7.0 million of 24-hour volume — routed flow cycling the pool more than twenty times daily. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, POWER or ZAMA?
By tracked market cap: POWER (BNB Chain) measures $14.73M and ZAMA (BNB Chain) measures $180.16M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, POWER or ZAMA?
On the contract checks we publish: POWER (BNB Chain) grades B and ZAMA (BNB Chain) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have POWER and ZAMA performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-11-10T21:13:10, the measured snapshots show POWER at −48.8% and ZAMA at −33.9%.
More comparisons
MON vs POWERPOWER vs CRVPOWER vs GOHOMEPYTH vs POWERZAMA vs CRVZAMA vs GOHOMEZAMA vs VIRTUALMON vs ZAMA
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-11-10T21:13:10; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.