Open app

POWER vs ERC20 — price, size and safety, side by side

POWER (BNB Chain) vs ERC20 (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-10 / 2026-11-10.

POWERB

$0.06312
Power on BNB Chain
Trade POWER
vs

ERC20B

$0.000000000000
ERC20 on BNB Chain
Trade ERC20

POWER vs ERC20 — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-11-10T21:13:10

100 — shared start
POWER −48.8%  ·  ERC20 −100.0% — both series rebased to 100 at the first measured point in the shared window; not a raw-price chart.
POWERERC20
Price$0.06312$0.000000000000
Market cap$14.73M$592
24h volume$1.65M all venues$3.95 DEX
Liquidity$378.29K$334.02K
FDV$3.94M$756.18
Holders3,9148,688
Age (days)291213
Safety gradeBB

Where they differ

What the data says

POWER

POWER at 0x9dc44ae5be187eca9e2a67e33f27a4c91cea1223 is a BNB Chain asset 291 days into its record at the November 6, 2026 snapshot. The asset-wide $14.7 million market cap sits above the $3.9 million fully-diluted figure priced on 52.9 million local units — most of the headline float trades elsewhere.

The local book is workable and the tape is hot: $378.3 thousand of tracked depth on $1.4 million of 24-hour volume — the pool cycling itself three times a day, a routed-flow book rather than a sitting one. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.

ERC20

ERC20 — a token literally named "ERC20" on BNB Chain at 0x58730ae0faa10d73b0cddb5e7b87c3594f7a20cb — carries the most extreme valuation split in this batch: a market cap of $592 against a fully diluted figure of $756.2 on the November 4, 2026 snapshot.

A $13.4B FDV over a $592 cap means the float is a rounding error — supply overwhelmingly sits outside circulation, so the circulating price says almost nothing about the token's headline value. The contract can mint on top of that, the top ten wallets hold about 76.3%, and even so 8,688 wallets hold positions — with $334.0 thousand of tracked depth, more book than the cap itself.

FAQ

Which is bigger, POWER or ERC20?

By tracked market cap: POWER (BNB Chain) measures $14.73M and ERC20 (BNB Chain) measures $592 — dated snapshots, not a live feed.

Which is safer, POWER or ERC20?

On the contract checks we publish: POWER (BNB Chain) grades B and ERC20 (BNB Chain) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.

How have POWER and ERC20 performed over the shared window?

Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-11-10T21:13:10, the measured snapshots show POWER at −48.8% and ERC20 at −100.0%.

More comparisons

MON vs POWERPOWER vs CRVPOWER vs GOHOMEPYTH vs POWERERC20 vs GOHOMECRV vs ERC20ERC20 vs VIRTUALMON vs ERC20

The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-11-10T21:13:10; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.

Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.