HostPLAY vs VVVEITY — price, size and safety, side by side
PLAY (Base) vs VVVEITY (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-26.
PLAY vs VVVEITY — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| PLAY | VVVEITY | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.03185 | $0.000005451 |
| Market cap | $11.67M | $113.09K |
| 24h volume | $1.06M | $737.43K |
| Liquidity | $301.30K | $242.59K |
| FDV | $124.98M | $113.09K |
| Holders | 6,454 | 1,554 |
| Age (days) | 140 | 77 |
| Safety grade | A | C |
Where they differ
- PLAY measures ~103× the market cap of VVVEITY
- PLAY measures ~4.2× the holder count of VVVEITY
- over the shared window PLAY moved +2.06% while VVVEITY moved −79.7%
What the data says
PLAY
PLAY at 0x853a7c99227499dba9db8c3a02aa691afdebf841 is a Base asset 140 days into its record at the September 26, 2026 snapshot. The $11.7 million market cap prices under a tenth of the $125.0 million fully-diluted figure on 5.0 billion units — the emission overhang dominates this book's shape.
The book is workable and the tape is hot: $301.3 thousand of tracked depth on $1.1 million of 24-hour volume — the pool cycling itself several times daily. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
VVVEITY
VVVEITY — Venice Deity on Base, 0x85635006d808030e97f3174c8ea1b4aa1f1feba3 — is a 77-day-old token at $243 thousand of liquidity in the September 26, 2026 snapshot, against roughly $737 thousand of daily volume.
The name reads like a riff on Venice.ai — the privacy-focused AI platform — wrapped in meme-religion styling. Whether it is a fan token, a theme coin riding Venice's brand gravity, or an unrelated project is not determinable from this row; the 3x daily turnover on an 11-week-old contract marks it as a live, churned, unprovenanced market.
FAQ
Which is bigger, PLAY or VVVEITY?
By tracked market cap: PLAY (Base) measures $11.67M and VVVEITY (Base) measures $113.09K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, PLAY or VVVEITY?
On the contract checks we publish: PLAY (Base) grades A and VVVEITY (Base) grades C. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have PLAY and VVVEITY performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show PLAY at +2.06% and VVVEITY at −79.7%.
More comparisons
SHMON vs PLAYPLAY vs PYTHIAHNT vs PLAYPLAY vs ZRPDREAMS vs VVVEITYVVVEITY vs RTRCUPSEY vs VVVEITYVVVEITY vs SILV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.