Open app

PLAY vs ELIZAOS — price, size and safety, side by side

PLAY (Base) vs ELIZAOS (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-27.

PLAYA

$0.03185
Play on Base
Trade PLAY
vs

ELIZAOSA

$0.0001692
elizaOS on Solana
Trade ELIZAOS

PLAY vs ELIZAOS — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24

100 — shared start
PLAY +2.06%  ·  ELIZAOS −1.73% — both series rebased to 100 at the first measured point in the shared window; not a raw-price chart.
PLAYELIZAOS
Price$0.03185$0.0001692
Market cap$11.67M$1.55M
24h volume$1.06M$2.58K
Liquidity$301.30K$2.45K
FDV$124.98M$1.55M
Holders6,4547,495
Age (days)140—
Safety gradeAA

Where they differ

What the data says

PLAY

PLAY at 0x853a7c99227499dba9db8c3a02aa691afdebf841 is a Base asset 140 days into its record at the September 26, 2026 snapshot. The $11.7 million market cap prices under a tenth of the $125.0 million fully-diluted figure on 5.0 billion units — the emission overhang dominates this book's shape.

The book is workable and the tape is hot: $301.3 thousand of tracked depth on $1.1 million of 24-hour volume — the pool cycling itself several times daily. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.

Full PLAY safety read →

ELIZAOS

ELIZAOS — "elizaOS" on Solana, mint DuMbhu7mvQvqQHGcnikDgb4XegXJRyhUBfdU22uELiZA — is the token of elizaOS: the actual open-source agent framework — the ai16z project's renamed framework that powers thousands of agents — on a wry "DuMbhu…" mint. The September 26, 2026 snapshot reads $1.55 million across 7,495 holders.

elizaOS is the most-used agent framework in crypto — a 9.5-billion supply at $0.00015 on a seven-thousand file is real-project scale. ~$1.8 thousand of daily volume on $2.4 thousand is a live book. Freeze revoked; mint unreported.

Full ELIZAOS safety read →

FAQ

Which is bigger, PLAY or ELIZAOS?

By tracked market cap: PLAY (Base) measures $11.67M and ELIZAOS (Solana) measures $1.55M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.

Which is safer, PLAY or ELIZAOS?

On the contract checks we publish: PLAY (Base) grades A and ELIZAOS (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.

How have PLAY and ELIZAOS performed over the shared window?

Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show PLAY at +2.06% and ELIZAOS at −1.73%.

More comparisons

SHMON vs PLAYPLAY vs PYTHIAHNT vs PLAYPLAY vs ZRPNFLXX vs ELIZAOSELIZAOS vs STBUSDPT vs ELIZAOSELIZAOS vs MCA

The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.

Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.