NexPLAY vs BLUECHIP — price, size and safety, side by side
PLAY (Base) vs BLUECHIP (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-07 / 2026-11-08.
PLAY vs BLUECHIP — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-11-07T18:16:33
| PLAY | BLUECHIP | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.0109 | $0.002506 |
| Market cap | $4.66M | $2.82M |
| 24h volume | $2.13M all venues | $908.74K all venues |
| Liquidity | $192.40K | $145.66K |
| FDV | $49.92M | $2.82M |
| Holders | 6,454 | 4,115 |
| Age (days) | 140 | 41 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- PLAY measures ~1.7× the market cap of BLUECHIP
- PLAY measures ~2.3× the 24h volume of BLUECHIP
- PLAY measures ~1.6× the holder count of BLUECHIP
- over the shared window PLAY moved −65.1% while BLUECHIP moved −78.9%
What the data says
PLAY
PLAY at 0x853a7c99227499dba9db8c3a02aa691afdebf841 is a Base asset 140 days into its record at the November 6, 2026 snapshot. The $4.7 million market cap prices under a tenth of the $49.9 million fully-diluted figure on 5.0 billion units — the emission overhang dominates this book's shape.
The book is workable and the tape is hot: $192.4 thousand of tracked depth on $1.1 million of 24-hour volume — the pool cycling itself several times daily. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
BLUECHIP
BLUECHIP at 0xb200000000000000000000cfbdf64a8706a94a01 is a Base asset 26 days into its record at the November 6, 2026 snapshot, priced at a $2.8 million market cap across a 1.0 billion supply — a name doing heavy lifting on a very young book.
The launch-window book is real: $145.7 thousand of deep tracked depth on $567.4 thousand of 24-hour volume — a pool that most of the tape cycles daily. Everything else is unwritten: no holder distribution in the snapshot, no contract-level controls assessed. A name that claims quality and a record still proving it.
FAQ
Which is bigger, PLAY or BLUECHIP?
By tracked market cap: PLAY (Base) measures $4.66M and BLUECHIP (Base) measures $2.82M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, PLAY or BLUECHIP?
On the contract checks we publish: PLAY (Base) grades A and BLUECHIP (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have PLAY and BLUECHIP performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-11-07T18:16:33, the measured snapshots show PLAY at −65.1% and BLUECHIP at −78.9%.
More comparisons
RENDER vs PLAYAAVE.E vs PLAYPLAY vs GRASSUVM vs PLAYCAT vs BLUECHIPFF vs BLUECHIPZRO vs BLUECHIPBLUECHIP vs LINK
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-11-07T18:16:33; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.