HostPIPPIN vs CARDS — price, size and safety, side by side
PIPPIN (Solana) vs CARDS (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
PIPPIN vs CARDS — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-27T15:10:18
| PIPPIN | CARDS | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.0189 | $0.192 |
| Market cap | $19.16M | $172.63M |
| 24h volume | $248.03K | $10.29M |
| Liquidity | $2.21M | $2.17M |
| FDV | $19.16M | $360.35M |
| Holders | 48,175 | 33,548 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- CARDS measures ~9.0× the market cap of PIPPIN
- CARDS measures ~41× the 24h volume of PIPPIN
- over the shared window PIPPIN moved −3.25% while CARDS moved +38.2%
What the data says
PIPPIN
PIPPIN is an AI-agent memecoin on Solana — a whimsical-character agent from the AI cohort that grew a genuine community around its generated persona. The September 26, 2026 snapshot reads $19.2 million across 48,175 wallets on mint Dfh5DzRgSvvCFDoYc2ciTkMrbDfRKybA4SoFbPmApump.
AI-character tokens sit between memecoin and platform token: the "product" is the agent's persona and output, so the token prices on whether that output keeps an audience. PIPPIN's recognized position in the cohort is what its chart is made of.
CARDS
CARDS is Collector Crypt's token — a tokenized trading-card marketplace where physical cards (Pokémon, sports) sit in custody and trade as redeemable on-chain assets. The mint CARDSccUMFKoPRZxt5vt3ksUbxEFEcnZ3H2pd3dKxYjp is what our scan tracks: $172.6 million market cap ($360 million fully diluted), $2.2 million of pool liquidity, 33,548 holders as of September 26, 2026.
The honest read: RWA-collectible platforms are one of the more defensible crypto theses — real inventory, real redemption — and the two numbers that matter here are custody (the cards have to physically exist and ship) and the mcap-to-FDV gap (less than half the supply circulates). A real business underneath, with token-dilution mechanics on top.
FAQ
Which is bigger, PIPPIN or CARDS?
By tracked market cap: PIPPIN (Solana) measures $19.16M and CARDS (Solana) measures $172.63M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, PIPPIN or CARDS?
On the contract checks we publish: PIPPIN (Solana) grades A and CARDS (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have PIPPIN and CARDS performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-27T15:10:18, the measured snapshots show PIPPIN at −3.25% and CARDS at +38.2%.
More comparisons
ANSEM vs PIPPINPIPPIN vs RNTTIBBIR vs PIPPINPIPPIN vs VIRTUALVIRTUAL vs CARDSRNT vs CARDSCARDS vs WTAOANSEM vs CARDS
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-27T15:10:18; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.