NexPIEVERSE vs 龙虾 — price, size and safety, side by side
PIEVERSE (BNB Chain) vs 龙虾 (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-11 / 2026-11-11.
PIEVERSE vs 龙虾 — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-11-11T18:19:14
| PIEVERSE | 龙虾 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.62 | $0.01808 |
| Market cap | $389.59M | $17.29M |
| 24h volume | $18.46M all venues | $3.09M all venues |
| Liquidity | $809.88K | $791.97K |
| FDV | $128.58M | $17.29M |
| Holders | 345,165 | 92,257 |
| Age (days) | 330 | 224 |
| Safety grade | C | A |
Where they differ
- PIEVERSE measures ~23× the market cap of 龙虾
- PIEVERSE measures ~6.0× the 24h volume of 龙虾
- PIEVERSE measures ~3.7× the holder count of 龙虾
- over the shared window PIEVERSE moved −13.9% while 龙虾 moved −93.0%
What the data says
PIEVERSE
PIEVERSE at 0x0e63b9c287e32a05e6b9ab8ee8df88a2760225a9 — Pieverse Token — is a 312-day-old BNB Chain book priced at a $389.6 million asset-wide market cap against a $128.6 million fully-diluted figure priced on 90.7 million local units at the November 6, 2026 snapshot.
The local book is thin for the half-billion headline and the tape is loud: $809.9 thousand of tracked depth on $14.8 million of 24-hour volume — routed flow cycling the pool nineteen times daily. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
龙虾
The token at 0xeccbb861c0dda7efd964010085488b69317e4444 — tickered 龙虾 ("lobster") — is a BNB Chain community asset 206 days into its record at the November 6, 2026 snapshot, priced at a $17.3 million market cap across a 1.0 billion supply.
The book is thin for a quarter-billion float: $792 thousand of tracked depth on $6.8 million of 24-hour volume — a tape cycling nearly three times the pool daily. That profile — high cap, thin measured book, heavy turnover — is the one where the pool number matters most, because it bounds what an on-chain exit of any size can actually clear. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, PIEVERSE or 龙虾?
By tracked market cap: PIEVERSE (BNB Chain) measures $389.59M and 龙虾 (BNB Chain) measures $17.29M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, PIEVERSE or 龙虾?
On the contract checks we publish: PIEVERSE (BNB Chain) grades C and 龙虾 (BNB Chain) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have PIEVERSE and 龙虾 performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-11-11T18:19:14, the measured snapshots show PIEVERSE at −13.9% and 龙虾 at −93.0%.
More comparisons
USDT0 vs PIEVERSEPIEVERSE vs USD₮0PIEVERSE vs TBTCAKE vs PIEVERSE龙虾 vs USD₮0龙虾 vs TBTCUSDT0 vs 龙虾龙虾 vs USDC.E
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-11-11T18:19:14; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.