HostPENDLE vs LBTC — price, size and safety, side by side
PENDLE (Arbitrum) vs LBTC (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
PENDLE vs LBTC — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-27T15:10:18
| PENDLE | LBTC | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $2.64 | $84.86K |
| Market cap | $457.55M | $8.61M |
| 24h volume | $1.20M | $25.53K |
| Liquidity | $3.40M | $3.36M |
| FDV | $38.28M | $8.61M |
| Holders | 70,287 | 472 |
| Age (days) | 1,293 | — |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- PENDLE measures ~53× the market cap of LBTC
- PENDLE measures ~47× the 24h volume of LBTC
- PENDLE measures ~149× the holder count of LBTC
What the data says
PENDLE
PENDLE on Arbitrum at 0x0c880f6761f1af8d9aa9c466984b80dab9a8c9e8 is the bridged deployment of the yield-tokenization protocol's token — the asset behind the principal-and-yield-splitting market that turned fixed yield into a DeFi primitive. The September 27, 2026 snapshot prices the Arbitrum-local supply of 14.6 million units at $38.3 million fully diluted, against an asset-wide $457.6 million market cap.
$3.4 million of tracked pool depth on this chain is thin measured the way the depth flag measures — against the asset-wide figure — but functional: $632.8 thousand of 24-hour volume moves through it. The 1,293-day record belongs to a token whose liquidity genuinely spans chains, with Ethereum holding the canonical supply and Arbitrum holding the routed share, so the local book is a window on the market rather than the market itself.
LBTC
LBTC is Lombard's staked Bitcoin — the liquid-staking token that puts BTC to work in Babylon's staking layer while circulating as a DeFi-usable claim, one of the "productive BTC" class that grew out of Babylon's launch. The mint LBTCgU4b3wsFKsPwBn1rRZDx5DoFutM6RPiEt1TPDsY is the Solana deployment; our September 26, 2026 snapshot reads $3.4 million of tracked pool liquidity and grades it A.
The honest mechanics: LBTC is a claim on BTC that's been restaked into Babylon's security model — the yield is Babylon's protocol paying for its security budget, which means the return is emissions-shaped (real but endogenous to the system) rather than external revenue. The custody chain is Lombard's consortium model; on Solana, add the bridge that carried it here.
FAQ
Which is bigger, PENDLE or LBTC?
By tracked market cap: PENDLE (Arbitrum) measures $457.55M and LBTC (Solana) measures $8.61M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, PENDLE or LBTC?
On the contract checks we publish: PENDLE (Arbitrum) grades B and LBTC (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have PENDLE and LBTC performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-27T15:10:18, the measured snapshots show PENDLE at −4.03% and LBTC at −1.54%.
More comparisons
PENDLE vs WBTCPENDLE vs GULDMSUSD vs PENDLEPOD vs PENDLEEURC vs LBTCLBTC vs DBRGULD vs LBTCWBTC vs LBTC
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-27T15:10:18; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.