HostPEAR vs RAIN — price, size and safety, side by side
PEAR (Arbitrum) vs RAIN (Arbitrum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
PEAR vs RAIN — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-27T18:22:06
| PEAR | RAIN | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.03808 | $0.01257 |
| Market cap | $19.57M | $9.02B |
| 24h volume | $90.37K | $1.25M |
| Liquidity | $714.58K | $673.53K |
| FDV | $32.45M | $14.52B |
| Holders | 2,400 | 173,887 |
| Age (days) | 725 | 337 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- RAIN measures ~461× the market cap of PEAR
- RAIN measures ~14× the 24h volume of PEAR
- RAIN measures ~72× the holder count of PEAR
- over the shared window PEAR moved +15.1% while RAIN moved −10.8%
What the data says
PEAR
PEAR at 0x3212dc0f8c834e4de893532d27cc9b6001684db0 is an Arbitrum asset 725 days into its record at the September 27, 2026 snapshot, priced at a $19.6 million market cap with a $32.5 million fully-diluted figure on 852.2 million units showing the emission still ahead.
The book is workable for the cap: $714.6 thousand of tracked depth on $58.0 thousand of 24-hour volume — a pool that clears ordinary size and a quiet tape that mostly holds. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot, so the authority posture is a live-scan question rather than an assumption here.
RAIN
RAIN is a mid-cap token on Arbitrum trading on real depth: the contract 0x25118290e6a5f4139381d072181157035864099d is what our scan tracks, with $674 thousand of pool liquidity as of September 27, 2026.
The honest note is about verifiability rather than the project: tokens in this tier have shallow public documentation, and our scan's read is primarily on-chain — the pool is real and functional, but verify the project's identity and contract ownership through its official channels before treating the liquidity as endorsement. Arbitrum hosts a long tail of tokens that look similar in a scan.
FAQ
Which is bigger, PEAR or RAIN?
By tracked market cap: PEAR (Arbitrum) measures $19.57M and RAIN (Arbitrum) measures $9.02B — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, PEAR or RAIN?
On the contract checks we publish: PEAR (Arbitrum) grades A and RAIN (Arbitrum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have PEAR and RAIN performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-27T18:22:06, the measured snapshots show PEAR at +15.1% and RAIN at −10.8%.
More comparisons
PEAR vs GMEPEAR vs DESPXAPEAR vs LFIAVA vs PEARB3 vs RAINRAIN vs SANCUSDT.E vs RAINUMBRA vs RAIN
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-27T18:22:06; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.