NexOPG vs GITLAWB — price, size and safety, side by side
OPG (BNB Chain) vs GITLAWB (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-10 / 2026-11-15.
OPG vs GITLAWB — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-11-10T21:13:10
| OPG | GITLAWB | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.129 | $0.000005889 |
| Market cap | $28.28M | $818.56K |
| 24h volume | $3.75M all venues | $52.82K all venues |
| Liquidity | $687.20K | $175.09K |
| FDV | $5.24M | $810.72K |
| Holders | 39,270 | 11,544 |
| Age (days) | 153 | 194 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- OPG measures ~35× the market cap of GITLAWB
- OPG measures ~3.9× the liquidity of GITLAWB
- OPG measures ~71× the 24h volume of GITLAWB
- OPG measures ~3.4× the holder count of GITLAWB
- over the shared window OPG moved −1.32% while GITLAWB moved −87.6%
What the data says
OPG
OPG at 0x5feccd17c393caf1001d18164236a37e731fcb9d — OpenGradient — is a young BNB Chain asset just 153 days into its record at the November 6, 2026 snapshot, and it already carries one of the widest holder books on the chain: 39,270 wallets share the 41.3 million supply.
The contract is the locked kind: mint and freeze authority are both revoked, the contract cannot create new supply, and it is not a proxy. The counterweights are measured too: the ten largest wallets hold 92.9% of supply behind the wide holder count, and the $28.3 million market cap sits above the $5.2 million fully-diluted figure — an inversion where the priced float exceeds the local supply basis. $687.2 thousand of workable tracked depth sees a striking $7.6 million of 24-hour volume — a tape turning over ten times the pool daily.
GITLAWB
GITLAWB at 0x5f980dcfc4c0fa3911554cf5ab288ed0eb13dba3 is a Base asset 194 days into its record at the November 6, 2026 snapshot, priced at a $819 thousand market cap across a 100.0 billion supply.
The book is unusually liquid for the cap: $175 thousand of tracked depth is deep — nearly a third of the valuation — and the $1.5 million daily volume nearly cycles the whole pool every day, a genuinely active tape rather than a dormant holding. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot, so authority posture is a live-scan question, not an assumption here.
FAQ
Which is bigger, OPG or GITLAWB?
By tracked market cap: OPG (BNB Chain) measures $28.28M and GITLAWB (Base) measures $818.56K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, OPG or GITLAWB?
On the contract checks we publish: OPG (BNB Chain) grades A and GITLAWB (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have OPG and GITLAWB performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-11-10T21:13:10, the measured snapshots show OPG at −1.32% and GITLAWB at −87.6%.
More comparisons
USDC.E vs OPGTBTC vs OPGUSD₮0 vs OPGOPG vs HLXGITLAWB vs GRASSGITLAWB vs ETHFIGITLAWB vs ZRORENDER vs GITLAWB
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-11-10T21:13:10; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.