HostOLD SLERF vs JUPUSD — price, size and safety, side by side
OLD SLERF (Solana) vs JUPUSD (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
OLD SLERF vs JUPUSD — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-27T18:22:06
| OLD SLERF | JUPUSD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.02401 | $0.9996 |
| Market cap | $11.85M | $43.99M |
| 24h volume | $2.05K | $17.97M |
| Liquidity | $20.58M | $19.72M |
| FDV | $11.85M | $43.99M |
| Holders | 48,751 | 12,380 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- JUPUSD measures ~3.7× the market cap of OLD SLERF
- JUPUSD measures ~8,753× the 24h volume of OLD SLERF
- OLD SLERF measures ~3.9× the holder count of JUPUSD
- over the shared window OLD SLERF moved +21.4% while JUPUSD moved −0.01%
What the data says
OLD SLERF
This is OLD SLERF — the unmigrated predecessor of SLERF, the memecoin famous for its creator accidentally burning the entire presale raise, then surviving on the sheer notoriety of that mistake. The September 26, 2026 snapshot reads $11.8 million across 48,751 wallets on mint 7BgBvyjrZX1YKz4oh9mjb8ZScatkkwb8DzFx7LoiVkM3.
"Unmigrated" is the operative word: a successor contract exists, and this deployment is the legacy remnant. Holding the old unit of a migrated token is a specific position — you own the version the project moved away from, which typically means a stranded asset unless the community re-adopts it.
JUPUSD
JupUSD is Jupiter's own dollar — the stablecoin the Solana DEX aggregator issued (with Ethena's infrastructure behind it) to give its venue a native settlement asset rather than renting someone else's. The mint JuprjznTrTSp2UFa3ZBUFgwdAmtZCq4MQCwysN55USD is the Solana deployment; our September 26, 2026 snapshot reads $19.7 million of tracked pool liquidity and grades it A.
The honest framing: a venue-issued stablecoin's distribution is the venue — JupUSD's depth is guaranteed wherever Jupiter routes, and its incentive is adoption across the same pools this index measures. The risk shape is two-part: the Ethena-style reserve mechanics underneath plus Jupiter's operational role on top; neither is a fiat attestation, and an A grade here is a contract-state verdict, not a balance-sheet one.
FAQ
Which is bigger, OLD SLERF or JUPUSD?
By tracked market cap: OLD SLERF (Solana) measures $11.85M and JUPUSD (Solana) measures $43.99M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, OLD SLERF or JUPUSD?
On the contract checks we publish: OLD SLERF (Solana) grades A and JUPUSD (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have OLD SLERF and JUPUSD performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-27T18:22:06, the measured snapshots show OLD SLERF at +21.4% and JUPUSD at −0.01%.
More comparisons
OLD SLERF vs PAXGOLD SLERF vs USDMVVV vs OLD SLERFUSDT vs OLD SLERFJUPUSD vs RAYUSDM vs JUPUSDJUPUSD vs KBTCPAXG vs JUPUSD
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-27T18:22:06; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.