HostNXPC vs BEAR — price, size and safety, side by side
NXPC (Avalanche) vs BEAR (Avalanche) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
NXPC vs BEAR — normalized performance, 2026-09-26 to 2026-09-27T15:10:18
| NXPC | BEAR | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.2516 | $0.00000003843 |
| Market cap | $36.12M | — |
| 24h volume | $18.70K | $0.00 |
| Liquidity | $5.87K | $4.69K |
| FDV | $32.67M | $16.17K |
| Holders | 54,332 | 5,263 |
| Age (days) | 494 | 1,018 |
| Safety grade | E | C |
Where they differ
- NXPC measures ~10× the holder count of BEAR
- over the shared window NXPC moved −2.33% while BEAR moved −46.8%
What the data says
NXPC
NXPC is the token tied to Nexpace, the Web3 arm of the MapleStory franchise — the Avalanche deployment at 0x5e0e90e268bc247cc850c789a0db0d5c7621fb59 prices a $36.1 million market cap across 54,332 wallets on the September 27, 2026 snapshot, 494 days into the token's life.
The contract read is the most dangerous in this batch: the owner can rewrite balances outright — the flag that turns every other number cosmetic — alongside live mint and pause levers, while the top ten wallets hold about 89.2% of the supply. The tracked book of $5.9 thousand against a $33M cap is not a market; it is a vestige.
BEAR
BEAR is a 1,018-day-old Avalanche token at 0x19c79f282d151995d91f6dbdda2739701f9c47aa — nearly three years in — priced at a $16.2 thousand market cap across 5,263 wallets on the September 27, 2026 snapshot.
The book has collapsed to a vestige: $4.7 thousand of tracked liquidity against a $16K cap, and the contract kept one live lever — it can mint new supply, so circulation is a floor. The top ten wallets hold about 51.1%, meaning even a five-figure cap is half-held by ten addresses. The grade is C at 60 — the snapshot's honest sum of thin venue, live mint, and concentrated float.
FAQ
Which is bigger, NXPC or BEAR?
By tracked market cap: NXPC (Avalanche) measures $36.12M and BEAR (Avalanche) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, NXPC or BEAR?
On the contract checks we publish: NXPC (Avalanche) grades E and BEAR (Avalanche) grades C. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have NXPC and BEAR performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-26 and 2026-09-27T15:10:18, the measured snapshots show NXPC at −2.33% and BEAR at −46.8%.
More comparisons
NXPC vs OPOSNXPC vs KINBTCAT vs NXPCNIKITA vs NXPCWFRAGSOL vs BEARJUGS vs BEARLLYX vs BEARMOBILE vs BEAR
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-26→2026-09-27T15:10:18; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.