HostNOCHILL vs GUN — price, size and safety, side by side
NOCHILL (Avalanche) vs GUN (Avalanche) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
NOCHILL vs GUN — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-27T15:10:18
| NOCHILL | GUN | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.0004495 | $0.003207 |
| Market cap | $696.73K | $11.24M |
| 24h volume | $4.76K | $7.67K |
| Liquidity | $53.07K | $20.29K |
| FDV | $692.11K | $2.16M |
| Holders | 44,418 | 5,725 |
| Age (days) | 1,008 | 535 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- GUN measures ~16× the market cap of NOCHILL
- NOCHILL measures ~2.6× the liquidity of GUN
- GUN measures ~1.6× the 24h volume of NOCHILL
- NOCHILL measures ~7.8× the holder count of GUN
- over the shared window NOCHILL moved −22.8% while GUN moved +4.87%
What the data says
NOCHILL
NOCHILL at 0xacfb898cff266e53278cc0124fc2c7c94c8cb9a5 is an Avalanche community token 1,008 days into its record at the September 27, 2026 snapshot, priced at a $696.7 thousand market cap across a 1.6 billion supply.
The book is deep for the cap and the tape is busy: $53.1 thousand of tracked depth on $71.3 thousand of 24-hour volume — the pool cycling above itself daily nearly three years in. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
GUN
GUN — the GUNZ network token — is a 535-day-old Avalanche asset at 0x26debd39d5ed069770406fca10a0e4f8d2c743eb, priced at a $11.2 million market cap across 5,725 wallets on the September 27, 2026 snapshot.
Two flags do the talking: the contract sits behind a proxy, so its logic is upgradeable after the fact, and the top ten wallets hold about 80.3% of the supply — a heavily concentrated float. The venue side is the third caveat: $20.3 thousand of tracked liquidity is a vestige against the cap, so the token is far more widely held than it is tradably deep.
FAQ
Which is bigger, NOCHILL or GUN?
By tracked market cap: NOCHILL (Avalanche) measures $696.73K and GUN (Avalanche) measures $11.24M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, NOCHILL or GUN?
On the contract checks we publish: NOCHILL (Avalanche) grades A and GUN (Avalanche) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have NOCHILL and GUN performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-27T15:10:18, the measured snapshots show NOCHILL at −22.8% and GUN at +4.87%.
More comparisons
NOCHILL vs ISCNOCHILL vs BIGBALLSNOCHILL vs NYANNOCHILL vs CTANPOWSCHE vs GUNLABZ vs GUNAICMP vs GUN霞 vs GUN
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-27T15:10:18; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.