Open app

NEAR vs VELVET — price, size and safety, side by side

NEAR (Ethereum) vs VELVET (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-27.

NEARB

$4.87
NEAR on Ethereum
Trade NEAR
vs

VELVETB

$0.06182
Velvet on Base
Trade VELVET

NEAR vs VELVET — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24

100 — shared start
NEAR +15.9%  ·  VELVET −0.54% — both series rebased to 100 at the first measured point in the shared window; not a raw-price chart.
NEARVELVET
Price$4.87$0.06182
Market cap$15.74M$28.67M
24h volume$995.23K$321.78K
Liquidity$420.92K$414.44K
FDV$15.78M$871.66K
Holders14,55211,182
Age (days)904394
Safety gradeBB

Where they differ

What the data says

NEAR

NEAR at 0x85f17cf997934a597031b2e18a9ab6ebd4b9f6a4 is the Ethereum-issued claim on the NEAR asset — a wrapped deployment 904 days into its record at the September 26, 2026 snapshot, priced at a $15.7 million market cap across 3.8 million local units.

The tape outpaces the book: $995.2 thousand of 24-hour volume against $420.9 thousand of workable tracked depth — turnover above twice the pool daily, the signature of an asset that clears through routed flow rather than deep standing liquidity. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.

Full NEAR safety read →

VELVET

Velvet (VELVET) is a DeFi-infrastructure token — a portfolio and intent-management stack that sits between asset-management UX and on-chain execution — deployed on Base at 0xbf927b841994731c573bdf09ceb0c6b0aa887cdd. Our September 27, 2026 read shows $414 thousand of tracked pool liquidity.

The honest note: infrastructure tokens earn their valuation on integrations and flow, not narrative — the check is whether the stack actually routes volume under real users, which liquidity alone cannot tell you.

Full VELVET safety read →

FAQ

Which is bigger, NEAR or VELVET?

By tracked market cap: NEAR (Ethereum) measures $15.74M and VELVET (Base) measures $28.67M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.

Which is safer, NEAR or VELVET?

On the contract checks we publish: NEAR (Ethereum) grades B and VELVET (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.

How have NEAR and VELVET performed over the shared window?

Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show NEAR at +15.9% and VELVET at −0.54%.

More comparisons

NEAR vs PRLNEAR vs HIMSNEAR vs CRVNEAR vs SUPERSUPER vs VELVETCRV vs VELVETHIMS vs VELVETPRL vs VELVET

The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.

Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.