HostNEAR vs LSK — price, size and safety, side by side
NEAR (Ethereum) vs LSK (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-26.
NEAR vs LSK — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| NEAR | LSK | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $4.87 | $0.4297 |
| Market cap | $15.74M | $103.81M |
| 24h volume | $995.23K | $4.44M |
| Liquidity | $420.92K | $343.21K |
| FDV | $15.78M | $103.81M |
| Holders | 14,552 | 3,618 |
| Age (days) | 904 | 483 |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- LSK measures ~6.6× the market cap of NEAR
- LSK measures ~4.5× the 24h volume of NEAR
- NEAR measures ~4.0× the holder count of LSK
- over the shared window NEAR moved +15.9% while LSK moved −16.9%
What the data says
NEAR
NEAR at 0x85f17cf997934a597031b2e18a9ab6ebd4b9f6a4 is the Ethereum-issued claim on the NEAR asset — a wrapped deployment 904 days into its record at the September 26, 2026 snapshot, priced at a $15.7 million market cap across 3.8 million local units.
The tape outpaces the book: $995.2 thousand of 24-hour volume against $420.9 thousand of workable tracked depth — turnover above twice the pool daily, the signature of an asset that clears through routed flow rather than deep standing liquidity. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
LSK
LSK is the Lisk token on Ethereum — the asset of one of crypto's oldest sidechain projects, which migrated from its own network to become an EVM L2. The contract 0x6033f7f88332b8db6ad452b7c6d5bb643990ae3f is what our scan tracks: $343 thousand of pool liquidity as of September 26, 2026.
The honest frame for a veteran migration: Lisk is a survivor — nearly a decade old — but survivorship is not momentum. The token's case depends on its L2 winning real usage in a crowded field where it competes with much larger ecosystems, and the pool depth on Ethereum reflects a legacy holder base more than an active market.
FAQ
Which is bigger, NEAR or LSK?
By tracked market cap: NEAR (Ethereum) measures $15.74M and LSK (Ethereum) measures $103.81M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, NEAR or LSK?
On the contract checks we publish: NEAR (Ethereum) grades B and LSK (Ethereum) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have NEAR and LSK performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show NEAR at +15.9% and LSK at −16.9%.
More comparisons
NEAR vs PRLNEAR vs HIMSNEAR vs CRVNEAR vs SUPERLSK vs ORCALSK vs OTC果蝇 vs LSKHLX vs LSK
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.