HostNAKA vs GNS — price, size and safety, side by side
NAKA (Polygon) vs GNS (Arbitrum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-27.
NAKA vs GNS — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| NAKA | GNS | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.08179 | $0.4887 |
| Market cap | $8.78M | $11.60M |
| 24h volume | $22.86K | $21.37K |
| Liquidity | $56.13K | $213.78K |
| FDV | $16.14M | $8.18M |
| Holders | 29,236 | 14,134 |
| Age (days) | 1,748 | 832 |
| Safety grade | C | D |
Where they differ
- GNS measures ~3.8× the liquidity of NAKA
- NAKA measures ~2.1× the holder count of GNS
- over the shared window NAKA moved −8.76% while GNS moved +9.30%
What the data says
NAKA
NAKA at 0x311434160d7537be358930def317afb606c0d737 is the Nakamoto.Games token on Polygon — the utility asset of a long-running play-to-earn arcade platform, 1,748 days into its record at the September 26, 2026 snapshot. 29,236 holders share the book around an $8.8 million market cap, with a $16.1 million fully-diluted figure on 180.0 million units showing roughly half the supply still to emit.
The grade-pressuring reads are threefold. Mint authority is still active and new supply can be minted. Freeze authority is revoked. The ten largest wallets hold 69.5% of supply. And $56.1 thousand of thin tracked depth serves the cap on $22.9 thousand of daily volume: an exit book that clears only modest sizes.
GNS
GNS at 0x18c11fd286c5ec11c3b683caa813b77f5163a122 is the Gains Network token on Arbitrum — the asset of a decentralized leverage-trading platform, 832 days into its record at the September 27, 2026 snapshot. 14,134 holders share the book around a $11.6 million market cap, against a $8.2 million fully-diluted figure that sits below the cap — an unusual inversion reflecting a circulating float larger than the measured local supply basis of 16.7 million units.
The D grade is earned on the contract side: mint authority is still active and new supply can be minted. Freeze authority is revoked, and it is not a proxy. The ten largest wallets hold 56.7% of supply. $213.8 thousand of workable tracked depth sees $22.6 thousand of daily volume.
FAQ
Which is bigger, NAKA or GNS?
By tracked market cap: NAKA (Polygon) measures $8.78M and GNS (Arbitrum) measures $11.60M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, NAKA or GNS?
On the contract checks we publish: NAKA (Polygon) grades C and GNS (Arbitrum) grades D. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have NAKA and GNS performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show NAKA at −8.76% and GNS at +9.30%.
More comparisons
LOL vs NAKANAKA vs GHIBLIFOREST vs NAKARAYCAT vs NAKAGNS vs CBZECGNS vs NESTGNS vs DRAMARB vs GNS
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.