NexNADS vs FLING — price, size and safety, side by side
NADS (Monad) vs FLING (Monad) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-15 / 2026-11-15.
NADS vs FLING — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-11-15T15:15:30
| NADS | FLING | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.00003124 | $0.00001829 |
| Market cap | $36.67K | $16.44K |
| 24h volume | $872.62 DEX | $361.91 DEX |
| Liquidity | $6.82K | $4.84K |
| FDV | $36.67K | $14.82K |
| Holders | 3,466 | 496 |
| Age (days) | 313 | 28 |
| Safety grade | A | C |
Where they differ
- NADS measures ~2.2× the market cap of FLING
- NADS measures ~2.4× the 24h volume of FLING
- NADS measures ~7.0× the holder count of FLING
- over the shared window NADS moved −10.9% while FLING moved −91.6%
What the data says
NADS
NADS takes its name from Monad community slang — "nads" is what the chain's own culture calls its members — making this something like a self-referential mascot token for the Monad ecosystem itself. One billion units, 298 days old, 3,466 holders.
The contract is clean at 85/100: no mint, no pause or blacklist, verified source — the same grade-A template the rest of the Monad batch shows. Market structure is thin but proportionate: $7 thousand of liquidity against a market cap of $37 thousand, roughly four-to-one cap-to-pool, deep enough that routine trades clear without drama.
FLING
FLING is an early-stage token on Monad — the new high-throughput EVM chain whose token economy is still young. The contract 0xa9da3c77ec7cdc4dfaa1fe142af583543d1c540f is what our scan tracks: $5 thousand of pool liquidity as of November 6, 2026.
The honest frame for early Monad tokens generally: the chain itself is new, so every asset on it is early-stage by definition — thin pools, fast narratives, and a market that has not sorted winners from launch-week noise yet. Twenty-seven thousand dollars of liquidity is the practical fact: size any position against the pool, not the storyline.
FAQ
Which is bigger, NADS or FLING?
By tracked market cap: NADS (Monad) measures $36.67K and FLING (Monad) measures $16.44K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, NADS or FLING?
On the contract checks we publish: NADS (Monad) grades A and FLING (Monad) grades C. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have NADS and FLING performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-11-15T15:15:30, the measured snapshots show NADS at −10.9% and FLING at −91.6%.
More comparisons
NADS vs WEETHNADS vs RETHNADS vs NODANADS vs BNSOLFLING vs RETHWEETH vs FLINGFLING vs NODAFLING vs BNSOL
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-11-15T15:15:30; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.