HostMUMU vs PAJAMAS — price, size and safety, side by side
MUMU (Solana) vs PAJAMAS (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-28 / 2026-09-28.
MUMU vs PAJAMAS — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-28T00:25:52
| MUMU | PAJAMAS | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.0004453 | $0.0001377 |
| Market cap | $456.35K | $134.91K |
| 24h volume | $30.57K | $11.29 |
| Liquidity | $34.94K | $34.82K |
| FDV | $456.35K | $134.91K |
| Holders | 2,344 | 8,234 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- MUMU measures ~3.4× the market cap of PAJAMAS
- MUMU measures ~2,709× the 24h volume of PAJAMAS
- PAJAMAS measures ~3.5× the holder count of MUMU
- over the shared window MUMU moved −40.5% while PAJAMAS moved +13.4%
What the data says
MUMU
Mumu the Bull — MUMU — a durable bull-mascot Solana meme, one of the persistent animal-market tokens of the 2024 wave. Mint hf34pZHnV4entu9bdp4pFEmeKpivEUeSUhASgWopump; the September 26, 2026 snapshot shows about $35 thousand of liquidity and roughly 2,344 holders.
MUMU's claim to attention is longevity plus brand: "the bull" is the most on-the-nose bullish mascot a meme can carry, which makes it a permanent recurring character whenever Solana runs. Standard meme economics — no cash flows; the brand plus the surviving community is the asset.
PAJAMAS
PAJAMAS — "The First Youtube Cat" on Solana, mint FvER7SsvY5GqAMawf7Qfb5MnUUmDdbPNPg4nCa4zHoLw — is the token of a genuine piece of internet history: Pajamas, YouTube co-founder Steve Chen's cat — the subject of the first cat video ever uploaded to YouTube in 2005. The September 26, 2026 snapshot reads $135 thousand across 8,234 holders.
This is meme-archaeology at its most legitimate — not a meme inspired by internet history but a claim on the literal first cat video, the origin point of the entire cat-content economy. ~$13 of cap per wallet is a dust file; ~$287 of daily volume on $35 thousand is a frozen book. Mint and freeze revoked.
FAQ
Which is bigger, MUMU or PAJAMAS?
By tracked market cap: MUMU (Solana) measures $456.35K and PAJAMAS (Solana) measures $134.91K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, MUMU or PAJAMAS?
On the contract checks we publish: MUMU (Solana) grades A and PAJAMAS (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have MUMU and PAJAMAS performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-28T00:25:52, the measured snapshots show MUMU at −40.5% and PAJAMAS at +13.4%.
More comparisons
HAMI vs MUMUMUMU vs BRETTHUND vs MUMUDTF vs MUMUPAJAMAS vs MUSKITGINNAN vs PAJAMASAGIXT vs PAJAMASBRETT vs PAJAMAS
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-28T00:25:52; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.