HostMUBARAK vs ONDO — price, size and safety, side by side
MUBARAK (BNB Chain) vs ONDO (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-27.
MUBARAK vs ONDO — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| MUBARAK | ONDO | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.05857 | $0.5449 |
| Market cap | $43.13M | $2.65B |
| 24h volume | $2.18M | $6.20M |
| Liquidity | $963.32K | $1.34M |
| FDV | $41.95M | $5.45B |
| Holders | 31,220 | 212,919 |
| Age (days) | 557 | 977 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- ONDO measures ~62× the market cap of MUBARAK
- ONDO measures ~2.8× the 24h volume of MUBARAK
- ONDO measures ~6.8× the holder count of MUBARAK
- over the shared window MUBARAK moved +35.8% while ONDO moved +19.1%
What the data says
MUBARAK
MUBARAK at 0x5c85d6c6825ab4032337f11ee92a72df936b46f6 is the BNB Chain community token that became the chain's best-known meme of its cycle — 557 days into its record at the September 26, 2026 snapshot, with 31,220 holders around a $43.1 million market cap that sits effectively equal to its $41.9 million fully-diluted figure on 1.0 billion units: the float is out.
The contract posture is the locked kind: mint and freeze authority are both revoked, the contract cannot create new supply, and it is not a proxy — the full clean set. The distribution is the number to price: the ten largest wallets hold 88.5% of supply, the heavy top bracket typical of a launch-event meme that survived. $963.3 thousand of workable tracked depth sees $2.2 million of 24-hour volume — a tape that turns over more than twice the pool daily.
ONDO
ONDO is the governance token of Ondo Finance — the firm behind tokenized treasury products like OUSG and the USDY yieldcoin — so its market is a proxy for the real-world-asset trade rather than for one protocol’s cash flows. The deployment at 0xfaba6f8e4a5e8ab82f62fe7c39859fa577269be3 is the canonical Ethereum contract.
Our September 27, 2026 snapshot reads a $2.7 billion market cap ($5.4 billion fully-diluted on the full 10.0 billion supply) across 212,919 holders, with $1.3 million of tracked pool liquidity — thin against the headline — and a 68.8% top-ten share that matches a foundation-heavy cap table mid-unlock.
FAQ
Which is bigger, MUBARAK or ONDO?
By tracked market cap: MUBARAK (BNB Chain) measures $43.13M and ONDO (Ethereum) measures $2.65B — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, MUBARAK or ONDO?
On the contract checks we publish: MUBARAK (BNB Chain) grades A and ONDO (Ethereum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have MUBARAK and ONDO performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show MUBARAK at +35.8% and ONDO at +19.1%.
More comparisons
MUBARAK vs USDC.EMUBARAK vs TOLLYMUBARAK vs COOLSTBL vs MUBARAKONDO vs SOLLINK vs ONDOMUSD vs ONDOONDO vs ASTEROID
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.