HostMRVLX vs NVDAON — price, size and safety, side by side
MRVLX (Solana) vs NVDAON (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-31 / 2026-10-31.
MRVLX vs NVDAON — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-10-31T21:16:17
| MRVLX | NVDAON | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $184.10 | $204.41 |
| Market cap | $46.94M | $3.93M |
| 24h volume | — | $1.68K DEX |
| Liquidity | $3.01K | $2.69K |
| FDV | $46.94M | $3.93M |
| Holders | 381 | 1,869 |
| Safety grade | C | A |
Where they differ
- MRVLX measures ~12× the market cap of NVDAON
- NVDAON measures ~4.9× the holder count of MRVLX
- over the shared window MRVLX moved −16.4% while NVDAON moved −3.63%
What the data says
MRVLX
MRVLX is the xStock for Marvell Technology — Backed Finance's tokenized wrapper for a data-center semiconductor name. The mint XsuxRGDzbLjnJ72v74b7p9VY6N66uYgTCyfwwRjVCJA is what our scan tracks: $46.9 million market cap on $3.0 thousand of liquidity and 381 holders as of October 6, 2026.
Those figures describe a cap with almost no door: under two thousand dollars of pool liquidity underneath a roughly forty-million-dollar token supply. Treat the printed cap as arithmetic, not a valuation you could realize — and note the holder count is the smallest in the xStock line. The wrapper mechanics are Backed-standard; the liquidity posture is the outlier and is why our scan grades it C.
NVDAON
NVDAON is Ondo's tokenized NVIDIA — the third issuer family bringing tokenized equities to Solana (alongside Backed's xStocks and the pre-IPO products). The mint gEGtLTPNQ7jcg25zTetkbmF7teoDLcrfTnQfmn2ondo is what our scan tracks: $3.9 million market cap on $3 thousand of pool liquidity with 1,869 holders as of October 6, 2026.
The flag is arithmetic again: a real, regulated issuer product sitting on a five-hundred-dollar pool — Ondo's tokens settle and redeem through Ondo's own rails, so public-pool depth is structurally thin and most holders interact with the issuer rather than this market. The claim is real; the exit route is not the pool. Compare liquidity conditions before choosing between the tokenized-NVDA products on the chain.
FAQ
Which is bigger, MRVLX or NVDAON?
By tracked market cap: MRVLX (Solana) measures $46.94M and NVDAON (Solana) measures $3.93M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, MRVLX or NVDAON?
On the contract checks we publish: MRVLX (Solana) grades C and NVDAON (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have MRVLX and NVDAON performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-10-31T21:16:17, the measured snapshots show MRVLX at −16.4% and NVDAON at −3.63%.
More comparisons
RETH vs MRVLXMRVLX vs BNSOLMRVLX vs JITOSOLMRVLX vs JLUSDCRETH vs NVDAONNVDAON vs BNSOLNVDAON vs JITOSOLNVDAON vs JLUSDC
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-10-31T21:16:17; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.