HostMORPHO vs CRD — price, size and safety, side by side
MORPHO (Base) vs CRD (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17T20:24:07 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
MORPHO vs CRD — normalized performance, 2026-08-24 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| MORPHO | CRD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $2.76 | $2.13K |
| Market cap | — | — |
| 24h volume | $5.20M | $4.03B |
| Liquidity | $933.37K | $1.99B |
| FDV | — | — |
| Holders | — | — |
| Age (days) | 636 | 1 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- CRD measures ~2,127× the liquidity of MORPHO
- CRD measures ~774× the 24h volume of MORPHO
What the data says
MORPHO
MORPHO is the Morpho protocol's token — and Morpho is one of the most-used lending primitives in DeFi: isolated lending markets that other platforms (including Coinbase's cbBTC-backed loans) build on top of rather than competing with. The contract 0xbaa5cc21fd487b8fcc2f632f3f4e8d37262a0842 is the Base deployment our scan tracks, at $933 thousand of pool liquidity as of August 24, 2026.
The honest shape: MORPHO is a governance-and-alignment token on genuinely deep infrastructure — the protocol's TVL is real, the integrations are real — but the token itself was transfer-restricted at launch and unlocks later, so the float-vs-FDV gap and the token's actual claim on protocol growth are the two numbers to watch. Real product, thin float — that combination cuts both ways.
CRD
Four billion dollars is what CRD's venue feed claimed the token traded in a single day — on August 19, 2026, when Cirudu was approximately one day old. Put that figure next to the rest of the same snapshot: about $1.99 billion in claimed liquidity, a recorded market capitalization of zero, and no holder count at all. For scale, four billion dollars of daily turnover is what entire major exchanges do; a nameless day-old Base token reporting it while having no measurable owners is describing something that cannot exist. The parsimonious explanation is reported-figure inflation — trading volume manufactured against the token's own pools so that listing feeds repeat impressive numbers.
This page's honest scope: NexFlow's EVM snapshot grades market structure from those very venue feeds, which is why the incoherence above is the most valuable output the capture produced. The contract itself — mint powers, owner functions, transfer taxes, honeypot mechanics at 0x95735d3f68d045c942afb9ea1090f6b03150bfab — was not assessed in this snapshot, and with a token in this category, the contract is where the actual answer lives. Run the live scan above; it reads the chain, not the feed.
FAQ
Which is bigger, MORPHO or CRD?
By tracked market cap: MORPHO (Base) measures — and CRD (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, MORPHO or CRD?
On the contract checks we publish: MORPHO (Base) grades B and CRD (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have MORPHO and CRD performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-08-24 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show MORPHO at 0.00% and CRD at 0.00%.
More comparisons
MORPHO vs RYYMORPHO vs FKBMORPHO vs RDKMORPHO vs CCVCRD vs RYYCRD vs FKBCRD vs RDKCRD vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-08-24→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.