HostMOOBIFI vs UNI — price, size and safety, side by side
MOOBIFI (Optimism) vs UNI (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-26.
MOOBIFI vs UNI — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| MOOBIFI | UNI | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $102.41 | $9.63 |
| Market cap | $1.21M | $5.60B |
| 24h volume | $4.55K | $5.14M |
| Liquidity | $110.40K | $25.55M |
| FDV | $1.24M | $8.01B |
| Holders | 15,538 | 382,165 |
| Age (days) | 1,063 | 1,727 |
| Safety grade | C | A |
Where they differ
- UNI measures ~4,613× the market cap of MOOBIFI
- UNI measures ~231× the liquidity of MOOBIFI
- UNI measures ~1,129× the 24h volume of MOOBIFI
- UNI measures ~25× the holder count of MOOBIFI
- over the shared window MOOBIFI moved −1.77% while UNI moved +6.71%
What the data says
MOOBIFI
MOOBIFI is Beefy Finance's yield-bearing BIFI wrapper on Optimism — a "mooToken" receipt for BIFI deposited in the protocol's vault — at 0xc55e93c62874d8100dbd2dfe307edc1036ad5434, 1,063 days into its life on the September 27, 2026 snapshot.
A yield receipt inherits its risk twice: the wrapper contract and the vault strategy underneath it. The measured side is quiet — a $1.2 million market cap against $110.4 thousand of tracked liquidity and $4.6 thousand of daily volume — a vault receipt that mostly changes hands through mint-and-burn rather than pool flow. Contract-level controls weren't evaluated in this snapshot.
UNI
UNI is Uniswap's governance token — the asset of the protocol that invented the automated market maker and still clears more DEX volume than the rest of the field combined. The deployment 0x1f9840a85d5af5bf1d1762f925bdaddc4201f984 is the canonical mint; our September 26, 2026 snapshot reads $25.5 million of tracked pool liquidity on this pair set.
The honest asymmetry is the governance-token shape: UNI's thesis is control over a fee-generating machine, but the "fee switch" — the mechanism that would route protocol revenue to holders — has been proposed and deferred for years, so the token trades on governance value and the perennial expectation rather than cashflow it actually pays. That makes its valuation more reflexive than a productive asset's.
FAQ
Which is bigger, MOOBIFI or UNI?
By tracked market cap: MOOBIFI (Optimism) measures $1.21M and UNI (Ethereum) measures $5.60B — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, MOOBIFI or UNI?
On the contract checks we publish: MOOBIFI (Optimism) grades C and UNI (Ethereum) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have MOOBIFI and UNI performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show MOOBIFI at −1.77% and UNI at +6.71%.
More comparisons
SPACEX vs MOOBIFIPOS vs MOOBIFIMOOBIFI vs ROUTERMOOBIFI vs 牛马UNI vs FRXUSDGHO vs UNIUSD1 vs UNIUNI vs SUSDE
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.