HostMOOBIFI vs LUSD — price, size and safety, side by side
MOOBIFI (Optimism) vs LUSD (Optimism) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-26.
MOOBIFI vs LUSD — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| MOOBIFI | LUSD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $102.41 | $1.02 |
| Market cap | $1.21M | $26.02M |
| 24h volume | $4.55K | $688.59 |
| Liquidity | $110.40K | $95.76K |
| FDV | $1.24M | $109.89K |
| Holders | 15,538 | 6,714 |
| Age (days) | 1,063 | 1,566 |
| Safety grade | C | D |
Where they differ
- LUSD measures ~21× the market cap of MOOBIFI
- MOOBIFI measures ~6.6× the 24h volume of LUSD
- MOOBIFI measures ~2.3× the holder count of LUSD
What the data says
MOOBIFI
MOOBIFI is Beefy Finance's yield-bearing BIFI wrapper on Optimism — a "mooToken" receipt for BIFI deposited in the protocol's vault — at 0xc55e93c62874d8100dbd2dfe307edc1036ad5434, 1,063 days into its life on the September 27, 2026 snapshot.
A yield receipt inherits its risk twice: the wrapper contract and the vault strategy underneath it. The measured side is quiet — a $1.2 million market cap against $110.4 thousand of tracked liquidity and $4.6 thousand of daily volume — a vault receipt that mostly changes hands through mint-and-burn rather than pool flow. Contract-level controls weren't evaluated in this snapshot.
LUSD
LUSD at 0xc40f949f8a4e094d1b49a23ea9241d289b7b2819 is the Optimism-bridged deployment of Liquity's USD — the dollar whose Ethereum original is famously immutable, which makes the local contract posture here the detail that matters. The September 26, 2026 snapshot prices the 110.4 thousand local units at $109.9 thousand fully diluted, inside the asset-wide $26.0 million market cap.
Unlike the governance-free Ethereum contract, this bridged deployment — 1,566 days into its record — still holds an active mint authority and new supply can be minted. Freeze authority is revoked, and it is not a proxy. The book is nearly dormant: $95.8 thousand of thin tracked depth on $689 of 24-hour volume, with 6,714 holders whose ten largest wallets hold 82.0% of supply.
FAQ
Which is bigger, MOOBIFI or LUSD?
By tracked market cap: MOOBIFI (Optimism) measures $1.21M and LUSD (Optimism) measures $26.02M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, MOOBIFI or LUSD?
On the contract checks we publish: MOOBIFI (Optimism) grades C and LUSD (Optimism) grades D. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have MOOBIFI and LUSD performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show MOOBIFI at −1.77% and LUSD at +2.02%.
More comparisons
SPACEX vs MOOBIFIPOS vs MOOBIFIMOOBIFI vs ROUTERMOOBIFI vs 牛马WEN vs LUSDCNKT+ vs LUSDLUSD vs MIMSOLC vs LUSD
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.