HostMONCOCK vs SHRAMP — price, size and safety, side by side
MONCOCK (Monad) vs SHRAMP (Monad) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-26.
MONCOCK vs SHRAMP — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| MONCOCK | SHRAMP | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.0002338 | $0.0002294 |
| Market cap | $185.37K | $159.06K |
| 24h volume | $2.18K | $984.90 |
| Liquidity | $24.74K | $17.43K |
| FDV | $233.81K | $159.06K |
| Holders | 2,959 | 3,228 |
| Age (days) | 298 | 291 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- MONCOCK measures ~2.2× the 24h volume of SHRAMP
- over the shared window MONCOCK moved −9.50% while SHRAMP moved +44.2%
What the data says
MONCOCK
MONCOCK starts from a genuinely strong place at the contract level. Minting simply isn't in the contract, so dilution isn't on the table, and it can't pause transfers or blacklist wallets either, so your tokens stay yours to move and sell. Neither lever existing is the main reason MONCOCK's 85/100 comes down to market factors, not contract ones (2026-09-26).
On the market side, MONCOCK brings $24.74K of on-chain liquidity, 2,959 wallets holding and 298 days old as of 2026-09-26. The $24.74K pool stands up well to a ~$185.37K cap — depth like that means MONCOCK absorbs normal flow without the price lurching. A 2,959-holder base is a fair start, but distribution matters more than the count — check how much sits in the largest wallets before leaning on it.
SHRAMP
SHRAMP at 0x42a4aa89864a794de135b23c6a8d2e05513d7777 is a Monad community token 291 days into its record at the September 26, 2026 snapshot, with 3,228 holders sharing a 1.0 billion supply around an $159.1 thousand market cap.
The contract is the locked kind: mint and freeze authority are both revoked, the contract cannot create new supply, and it is not a proxy. The distribution is mid-heavy rather than extreme: the ten largest wallets hold 50.1% of supply. $17.4 thousand of deep tracked depth sees $985 of daily volume — a pool proportionate to the small cap.
FAQ
Which is bigger, MONCOCK or SHRAMP?
By tracked market cap: MONCOCK (Monad) measures $185.37K and SHRAMP (Monad) measures $159.06K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, MONCOCK or SHRAMP?
On the contract checks we publish: MONCOCK (Monad) grades A and SHRAMP (Monad) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have MONCOCK and SHRAMP performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show MONCOCK at −9.50% and SHRAMP at +44.2%.
More comparisons
MONCOCK vs OPENCLAWMONCOCK vs QUDEMONCOCK vs MANAMONCOCK vs THUMBSHRAMP vs LENNYRMDN vs SHRAMPARIA vs SHRAMPSLEAZE vs SHRAMP
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.