HostMNT vs GRASS — price, size and safety, side by side
MNT (Solana) vs GRASS (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
MNT vs GRASS — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-27T15:10:18
| MNT | GRASS | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.6732 | $0.6095 |
| Market cap | $3.19M | $509.46M |
| 24h volume | $195.53K | $4.06M |
| Liquidity | $295.01K | $292.72K |
| FDV | $3.19M | $509.46M |
| Holders | 701 | 380,863 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- GRASS measures ~160× the market cap of MNT
- GRASS measures ~21× the 24h volume of MNT
- GRASS measures ~543× the holder count of MNT
- over the shared window MNT moved +7.78% while GRASS moved +84.3%
What the data says
MNT
Mantle's MNT on Solana — the bridged claim on the governance/gas token of the Mantle Ethereum L2 — at mint 4SoQ8UkWfeDH47T56PA53CZCeW4KytYCiU65CwBWoJUt. The September 26, 2026 snapshot shows about $295 thousand of liquidity and roughly 701 holders.
MNT the asset is a real mid-cap L2 token — Mantle runs one of the larger Ethereum rollups, born from the BitDAO treasury, with the token doing gas and governance duty. The Solana version is a bridge claim; the canonical asset is ERC-20 and its real markets are on Mantle/Ethereum/CEXs.
GRASS
GRASS pays people for something they didn't know they could sell: idle internet bandwidth. Users run a browser extension or node, the network routes web-scraping traffic through their residential connections — primarily to gather training data for AI companies — and rewards flow back in tokens. It's one of the cleaner product stories in the DePIN category, and after an October 2024 airdrop to early node-runners, the token at mint Grass7B4RdKfBCjTKgSqnXkqjwiGvQyFbuSCUJr3XXjs reaches roughly $509.5 million of market capitalization across 380,863 holders in NexFlow's September 26, 2026 snapshot.
Structure: freeze authority revoked, so no one can lock holders out of selling; the creator-associated wallet share reads effectively zero; and the mint authority is not fully retired in this snapshot — consistent with a token whose supply still has scheduled distribution ahead of it (rewards, ecosystem, and investor allocations vesting on public timetables). That's the normal shape for a venture-backed network token, and it means future float growth is a calendar fact to price in rather than a surprise to fear.
FAQ
Which is bigger, MNT or GRASS?
By tracked market cap: MNT (Solana) measures $3.19M and GRASS (Solana) measures $509.46M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, MNT or GRASS?
On the contract checks we publish: MNT (Solana) grades A and GRASS (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have MNT and GRASS performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-27T15:10:18, the measured snapshots show MNT at +7.78% and GRASS at +84.3%.
More comparisons
MNT vs DOGZRP vs MNTMNT vs SCSMNT vs PURPEGRASS vs MILGRASS vs ZROPURPE vs GRASSSCS vs GRASS
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-27T15:10:18; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.