HostMKR vs H — price, size and safety, side by side
MKR (Ethereum) vs H (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-30 / 2026-10-31.
MKR vs H — normalized performance, 2026-09-27 to 2026-10-30T18:16:02
| MKR | H | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.58K | $0.05532 |
| Market cap | — | $157.99M |
| 24h volume | $140.63K DEX | $1.55M DEX |
| Liquidity | $1.31M | $1.19M |
| FDV | $146.77M | $787.33M |
| Holders | 75,008 | 183,204 |
| Age (days) | 1,813 | 5 |
| Safety grade | D | B |
Where they differ
- H measures ~11× the 24h volume of MKR
- H measures ~2.4× the holder count of MKR
- over the shared window MKR moved −8.15% while H moved −31.0%
What the data says
MKR
MKR — 0x9f8f72aa9304c8b593d555f12ef6589cc3a579a2 — is MakerDAO's governance token, caught mid-story: the protocol rebranded to Sky and re-denominated its governance asset (MKR → SKY at 1:24,000) while both tickers trade. This row tracks the original MKR contract — still live, still convertible — which makes its snapshot numbers read strange to anyone who doesn't know the migration is running.
The October 9, 2026 snapshot reads an $146.8 million fully-diluted value and $1.3 million of tracked depth against 75,008 holders — and a top-10 concentration of 197%, a number that is impossible on its face. Concentration over 100% is not a hidden whale; it is the snapshot double-counting supply that is mid-migration between the two tickers, an honest artifact of measuring a token that is half-converted.
H
H is Humanity Protocol's token — a palm-scan proof-of-personhood network, one of the "prove you're human without a government ID" projects that the AI era made fashionable. The contract 0xe76c5b78f93909d34404e9eb4c1f19e7582a5de1 is what our scan tracks, at $1.2 million of pool liquidity as of October 6, 2026.
The honest note: personhood tokens are a bet on two unproven things at once — that the biometric approach wins the Sybil-resistance market, and that the token captures the win. Biometric systems also carry a non-deletable risk shape: a leaked palm template can't be rotated like a password. Watch adoption metrics over narrative.
FAQ
Which is bigger, MKR or H?
By tracked market cap: MKR (Ethereum) measures — and H (Ethereum) measures $157.99M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, MKR or H?
On the contract checks we publish: MKR (Ethereum) grades D and H (Ethereum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have MKR and H performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-27 and 2026-10-30T18:16:02, the measured snapshots show MKR at −8.15% and H at −31.0%.
More comparisons
ONDO vs MKRMKR vs USDT0MKR vs QNTMKR vs TBTCUSDT0 vs HH vs QNTONDO vs HH vs TBTC
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-27→2026-10-30T18:16:02; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.