HostMITCH vs HOBBES — price, size and safety, side by side
MITCH (Solana) vs HOBBES (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
MITCH vs HOBBES — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-27T15:10:18
| MITCH | HOBBES | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.000745 | $0.0001141 |
| Market cap | $738.18K | $109.88K |
| 24h volume | $8.17K | $1.19K |
| Liquidity | $56.67K | $56.61K |
| FDV | $738.18K | $109.88K |
| Holders | 3,588 | 8,043 |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- MITCH measures ~6.7× the market cap of HOBBES
- MITCH measures ~6.9× the 24h volume of HOBBES
- HOBBES measures ~2.2× the holder count of MITCH
What the data says
MITCH
MITCH — "idrawline" on Solana, mint FDEF2U9geiWS7sdGPCUo2r1wGswkJr2mmVTECiH6pump — is the token of idrawline, a known Solana artist (the handle is on the record). The September 26, 2026 snapshot reads $738 thousand across 3,588 holders — and the creator wallet holds 80.1% of supply.
Let that number sit: four-fifths of the token's supply — ~$565 thousand of a $705k cap — is in the artist's own wallet, against $57 thousand of liquidity. The score (67, grade C-band) is the lowest in this cohort and the devPct is why. An artist keeping 80% of their own coin can be framed as "my work, my stake" — and economically it means the public float is ~$140k of the headline cap.
HOBBES
Ansem's Cat — HOBBES — the Solana meme of influencer Ansem's real cat, one of the more durable personality-adjacent tokens on the chain, at mint 6n7Janary9fqzxKaJVrhL9TG2F61VbAtwUMu1YZscaQS. The September 26, 2026 snapshot shows about $57 thousand of liquidity and roughly 8,043 holders.
Personality-pet memes are a durable sub-genre — the brand is anchored to a real, likable thing rather than a fabricated mascot — and HOBBES is the category's standard-bearer on Solana.
FAQ
Which is bigger, MITCH or HOBBES?
By tracked market cap: MITCH (Solana) measures $738.18K and HOBBES (Solana) measures $109.88K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, MITCH or HOBBES?
On the contract checks we publish: MITCH (Solana) grades B and HOBBES (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have MITCH and HOBBES performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-27T15:10:18, the measured snapshots show MITCH at −15.7% and HOBBES at −18.9%.
More comparisons
MITCH vs FRAXMITCH vs DOGE-1MITCH vs RAYCATMITCH vs FORESTHOBBES vs FRAXHOBBES vs DOGE-1HOBBES vs RAYCATHOBBES vs FOREST
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-27T15:10:18; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.