HostMIM vs LINK.E — price, size and safety, side by side
MIM (Avalanche) vs LINK.E (Avalanche) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
MIM vs LINK.E — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-27T15:10:18
| MIM | LINK.E | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.0278 | $14.30 |
| Market cap | $212.99K | $10.70B |
| 24h volume | $49.67K | $13.36K |
| Liquidity | $100.62K | $94.21K |
| FDV | $212.98K | $5.23M |
| Holders | 99,947 | 13,082 |
| Age (days) | 1,820 | 1,121 |
| Safety grade | D | C |
Where they differ
- LINK.E measures ~50,242× the market cap of MIM
- MIM measures ~3.7× the 24h volume of LINK.E
- MIM measures ~7.6× the holder count of LINK.E
- over the shared window MIM moved −72.0% while LINK.E moved +10.2%
What the data says
MIM
MIM — Magic Internet Money — is Abracadabra’s collateral-backed stablecoin, the asset that rode the 2021 leverage wave and has been shrinking toward the noise floor since. The Avalanche deployment at 0x130966628846bfd36ff31a822705796e8cb8c18d is one of the many chain homes left from the era when it went everywhere.
Our September 27, 2026 snapshot tells the story in numbers: a $213.0 thousand market cap ($213.0 thousand fully-diluted on the 7.4 million tokens here), 99,947 holders still carrying the remainder, $100.6 thousand of pool liquidity that reads deep only because the market cap fell to meet it, and $46.1 thousand traded in the last day. The token is 1,820 days old.
LINK.E
LINK.E at 0x5947bb275c521040051d82396192181b413227a3 is the legacy Avalanche Bridge deployment of Chainlink's token — the ".e" suffix marking the older bridge's claim — 1,121 days into its record at the September 27, 2026 snapshot. The asset-wide $10.7 billion market cap dwarfs the $5.2 million fully-diluted figure priced on 365.7 thousand local units.
The local book is thin for the headline: $94.2 thousand of tracked depth on $72.6 thousand of 24-hour volume. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, MIM or LINK.E?
By tracked market cap: MIM (Avalanche) measures $212.99K and LINK.E (Avalanche) measures $10.70B — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, MIM or LINK.E?
On the contract checks we publish: MIM (Avalanche) grades D and LINK.E (Avalanche) grades C. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have MIM and LINK.E performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-27T15:10:18, the measured snapshots show MIM at −72.0% and LINK.E at +10.2%.
More comparisons
LUNA vs MIMMIM vs AMCDONT vs MIMMIM vs AMIKOLINK.E vs KMSNX vs LINK.ELINK.E vs LDOSURGE vs LINK.E
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-27T15:10:18; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.