HostMIM vs KET — price, size and safety, side by side
MIM (Avalanche) vs KET (Avalanche) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-15 / 2026-11-15.
MIM vs KET — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-11-15T15:15:30
| MIM | KET | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.02489 | $0.0005659 |
| Market cap | $294.22K | $663.19K |
| 24h volume | $916.24 all venues | $261.77 all venues |
| Liquidity | $98.79K | $91.50K |
| FDV | $294.22K | $663.17K |
| Holders | 99,979 | 32,354 |
| Age (days) | 1,835 | 614 |
| Safety grade | D | A |
Where they differ
- KET measures ~2.3× the market cap of MIM
- MIM measures ~3.5× the 24h volume of KET
- MIM measures ~3.1× the holder count of KET
What the data says
MIM
MIM — Magic Internet Money — is Abracadabra’s collateral-backed stablecoin, the asset that rode the 2021 leverage wave and has been shrinking toward the noise floor since. The Avalanche deployment at 0x130966628846bfd36ff31a822705796e8cb8c18d is one of the many chain homes left from the era when it went everywhere.
Our November 6, 2026 snapshot tells the story in numbers: a $294.2 thousand market cap ($294.2 thousand fully-diluted on the 7.4 million tokens here), 99,979 holders still carrying the remainder, $98.8 thousand of pool liquidity that reads deep only because the market cap fell to meet it, and $46.1 thousand traded in the last day. The token is 1,820 days old.
KET
KET at 0xffff003a6bad9b743d658048742935fffe2b6ed7 is an Avalanche community token 614 days into its record at the November 6, 2026 snapshot, priced at a $663 thousand market cap across a 1.0 billion supply.
The book is deep for the cap and the tape healthy: $91.5 thousand of tracked depth on $65.8 thousand of 24-hour volume — a pool proportionate to the small valuation, cycling itself daily. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, MIM or KET?
By tracked market cap: MIM (Avalanche) measures $294.22K and KET (Avalanche) measures $663.19K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, MIM or KET?
On the contract checks we publish: MIM (Avalanche) grades D and KET (Avalanche) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have MIM and KET performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-11-15T15:15:30, the measured snapshots show MIM at −74.9% and KET at −73.0%.
More comparisons
LDO vs MIMMIM vs WLDAVAX vs MIMRAIN vs MIMWLD vs KETKET vs USDELDO vs KETAVAX vs KET
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-11-15T15:15:30; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.