HostMIM vs GOHM — price, size and safety, side by side
MIM (Avalanche) vs GOHM (Avalanche) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-15 / 2026-11-15.
MIM vs GOHM — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-11-15T15:15:30
| MIM | GOHM | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.02489 | $4.22K |
| Market cap | $294.22K | — |
| 24h volume | $916.24 all venues | $4.13K DEX |
| Liquidity | $98.79K | $97.30K |
| FDV | $294.22K | $2.84M |
| Holders | 99,979 | 7,457 |
| Age (days) | 1,835 | 1,758 |
| Safety grade | D | C |
Where they differ
- GOHM measures ~4.5× the 24h volume of MIM
- MIM measures ~13× the holder count of GOHM
- over the shared window MIM moved −74.9% while GOHM moved −23.0%
What the data says
MIM
MIM — Magic Internet Money — is Abracadabra’s collateral-backed stablecoin, the asset that rode the 2021 leverage wave and has been shrinking toward the noise floor since. The Avalanche deployment at 0x130966628846bfd36ff31a822705796e8cb8c18d is one of the many chain homes left from the era when it went everywhere.
Our November 6, 2026 snapshot tells the story in numbers: a $294.2 thousand market cap ($294.2 thousand fully-diluted on the 7.4 million tokens here), 99,979 holders still carrying the remainder, $98.8 thousand of pool liquidity that reads deep only because the market cap fell to meet it, and $46.1 thousand traded in the last day. The token is 1,820 days old.
GOHM
GOHM — Governance OHM — is the wrapped-governance form of Olympus's OHM, and it is one of the oldest assets in this batch: 1,758 days on the November 6, 2026 snapshot, at 0x321e7092a180bb43555132ec53aaa65a5bf84251 on Avalanche.
The numbers need their unit context: a per-token price of $5,479.54 across a supply of 621 pieces prices a fully diluted valuation of $2.8 million, against $97.3 thousand of tracked liquidity — a thin but proportional book for a vestige asset. GOHM inherits its risk twice: the wrapper contract and the rebasing OHM underneath it, and this snapshot didn't evaluate contract-level controls.
FAQ
Which is bigger, MIM or GOHM?
By tracked market cap: MIM (Avalanche) measures $294.22K and GOHM (Avalanche) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, MIM or GOHM?
On the contract checks we publish: MIM (Avalanche) grades D and GOHM (Avalanche) grades C. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have MIM and GOHM performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-11-15T15:15:30, the measured snapshots show MIM at −74.9% and GOHM at −23.0%.
More comparisons
LDO vs MIMMIM vs WLDAVAX vs MIMRAIN vs MIMGOHM vs WLDLDO vs GOHMAVAX vs GOHMGOHM vs USDE
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-11-15T15:15:30; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.