HostMIM vs CXO — price, size and safety, side by side
MIM (Avalanche) vs CXO (Polygon) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-26.
MIM vs CXO — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| MIM | CXO | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.0278 | $0.1563 |
| Market cap | $212.99K | $33.52M |
| 24h volume | $49.67K | $13.53K |
| Liquidity | $100.62K | $95.13K |
| FDV | $212.98K | $14.61M |
| Holders | 99,947 | 2,319 |
| Age (days) | 1,820 | 196 |
| Safety grade | D | B |
Where they differ
- CXO measures ~157× the market cap of MIM
- MIM measures ~3.7× the 24h volume of CXO
- MIM measures ~43× the holder count of CXO
- over the shared window MIM moved −47.4% while CXO moved +0.74%
What the data says
MIM
MIM — Magic Internet Money — is Abracadabra’s collateral-backed stablecoin, the asset that rode the 2021 leverage wave and has been shrinking toward the noise floor since. The Avalanche deployment at 0x130966628846bfd36ff31a822705796e8cb8c18d is one of the many chain homes left from the era when it went everywhere.
Our September 27, 2026 snapshot tells the story in numbers: a $213.0 thousand market cap ($213.0 thousand fully-diluted on the 7.4 million tokens here), 99,947 holders still carrying the remainder, $100.6 thousand of pool liquidity that reads deep only because the market cap fell to meet it, and $46.1 thousand traded in the last day. The token is 1,820 days old.
CXO
CXO at 0xf2ae0038696774d65e67892c9d301c5f2cbbda58 is a Polygon asset 196 days into its record at the September 26, 2026 snapshot. The asset-wide $33.5 million market cap sits above the $14.6 million fully-diluted figure priced on 118.0 million local units — under half the headline float trades on this chain.
The local book is thin for the cap: $95.1 thousand of tracked depth on $13.5 thousand of 24-hour volume. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, MIM or CXO?
By tracked market cap: MIM (Avalanche) measures $212.99K and CXO (Polygon) measures $33.52M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, MIM or CXO?
On the contract checks we publish: MIM (Avalanche) grades D and CXO (Polygon) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have MIM and CXO performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show MIM at −47.4% and CXO at +0.74%.
More comparisons
LUNA vs MIMMIM vs AMCDONT vs MIMMIM vs AMIKOSQUIRE vs CXOCXO vs TESTICLEUPT vs CXOCXO vs SOLNIC
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.