HostMETAC vs CRD — price, size and safety, side by side
METAC (Base) vs CRD (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17T20:24:07 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
METAC vs CRD — normalized performance, 2026-09-14 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| METAC | CRD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $669.44 | $2.13K |
| Market cap | — | — |
| 24h volume | $9.94M | $4.03B |
| Liquidity | $1.35M | $1.99B |
| FDV | — | — |
| Holders | — | — |
| Age (days) | 33 | 1 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- CRD measures ~1,469× the liquidity of METAC
- CRD measures ~405× the 24h volume of METAC
What the data says
METAC
One detail on METAC didn't fully resolve in the 2026-09-15 snapshot: its authority state. So rather than assume anything either way, it's worth a direct check, and the scanner above reads it live in a couple of seconds before you trade.
Market-wise, METAC carries $1.35M of on-chain liquidity and a young 33-day history as of 2026-09-15. Treat $1.35M as the room your trade has to work in — the smaller the pool relative to your size, the more your own order moves the price.
CRD
Four billion dollars is what CRD's venue feed claimed the token traded in a single day — on August 19, 2026, when Cirudu was approximately one day old. Put that figure next to the rest of the same snapshot: about $1.99 billion in claimed liquidity, a recorded market capitalization of zero, and no holder count at all. For scale, four billion dollars of daily turnover is what entire major exchanges do; a nameless day-old Base token reporting it while having no measurable owners is describing something that cannot exist. The parsimonious explanation is reported-figure inflation — trading volume manufactured against the token's own pools so that listing feeds repeat impressive numbers.
This page's honest scope: NexFlow's EVM snapshot grades market structure from those very venue feeds, which is why the incoherence above is the most valuable output the capture produced. The contract itself — mint powers, owner functions, transfer taxes, honeypot mechanics at 0x95735d3f68d045c942afb9ea1090f6b03150bfab — was not assessed in this snapshot, and with a token in this category, the contract is where the actual answer lives. Run the live scan above; it reads the chain, not the feed.
FAQ
Which is bigger, METAC or CRD?
By tracked market cap: METAC (Base) measures — and CRD (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, METAC or CRD?
On the contract checks we publish: METAC (Base) grades B and CRD (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have METAC and CRD performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-14 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show METAC at +0.08% and CRD at 0.00%.
More comparisons
METAC vs RYYMETAC vs FKBMETAC vs RDKMETAC vs CCVCRD vs RYYCRD vs FKBCRD vs RDKCRD vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-14→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.