NexMETA vs MCAT — price, size and safety, side by side
META (Solana) vs MCAT (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-15 / 2026-11-11.
META vs MCAT — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-11-11T18:19:14
| META | MCAT | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $3.04 | $0.6516 |
| Market cap | $89.98M | $56.87M |
| 24h volume | $884.90K all venues | $597.59K all venues |
| Liquidity | $1.24M | $0.00 |
| FDV | $89.98M | $604.65M |
| Holders | 6,762 | 23,117 |
| Age (days) | — | 11 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- META measures ~1.6× the market cap of MCAT
- MCAT measures ~3.4× the holder count of META
- over the shared window META moved −29.4% while MCAT moved +5.60%
What the data says
META
META is MetaDAO's token — the project that put futarchy (governance by prediction market) into real production on Solana: proposals pass or fail on whether a market prices the token higher with them, and the DAO's launchpad issues new projects under the same structure — you can spot those mints by the "meta" suffix this address itself carries, METAwkXcqyXKy1AtsSgJ8JiUHwGCafnZL38n3vYmeta. Our November 6, 2026 read shows $90.0 million market cap, $1.2 million of pool liquidity, and 6,762 holders.
The honest read: MetaDAO is one of the genuinely novel governance experiments running — futarchy has decades of academic lineage and this is its most concrete deployment. The token's bet is that governance-by-market out-allocates founder governance; the honest risks are the thin holder count for its market cap and that market-based governance can still be cornered by a deep-pocketed participant.
MCAT
MCAT — Marscat Token at 0xd69a4b260ef021ccd4e1c5f5a4fb522b032ce831 — is eleven days old on BNB Chain with 23,117 holders at the November 6, 2026 snapshot.
The contract checks clean: it cannot mint new supply, cannot pause or blacklist transfers, source is verified, and the creator wallet holds under 0.01%. The market is the unresolved half — tracked liquidity reads effectively zero in this pass even though the tape shows millions of dollars of daily volume, which usually means the pool sits somewhere the tracker's coverage missed rather than nowhere. The ten largest wallets hold about 93.8% of supply.
FAQ
Which is bigger, META or MCAT?
By tracked market cap: META (Solana) measures $89.98M and MCAT (BNB Chain) measures $56.87M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, META or MCAT?
On the contract checks we publish: META (Solana) grades A and MCAT (BNB Chain) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have META and MCAT performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-11-11T18:19:14, the measured snapshots show META at −29.4% and MCAT at +5.60%.
More comparisons
META vs QNTONDO vs METAMETA vs LITMORPHO vs METAMCAT vs BNSOLMCAT vs JITOSOLMCAT vs JLUSDCMCAT vs JUPSOL
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-11-11T18:19:14; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.