NexMETA vs 果蝇 — price, size and safety, side by side
META (Solana) vs 果蝇 (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-15 / 2026-11-09.
META vs 果蝇 — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-11-09T21:16:00
| META | 果蝇 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $3.04 | $0.000000000000 |
| Market cap | $89.98M | $7.83K |
| 24h volume | $884.90K all venues | $0.00 DEX |
| Liquidity | $1.24M | $5.51 |
| FDV | $89.98M | $7.72K |
| Holders | 6,762 | 1,815,204 |
| Age (days) | — | 5 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- META measures ~11,496× the market cap of 果蝇
- META measures ~225,905× the liquidity of 果蝇
- 果蝇 measures ~268× the holder count of META
- over the shared window META moved −29.7% while 果蝇 moved −100.0%
What the data says
META
META is MetaDAO's token — the project that put futarchy (governance by prediction market) into real production on Solana: proposals pass or fail on whether a market prices the token higher with them, and the DAO's launchpad issues new projects under the same structure — you can spot those mints by the "meta" suffix this address itself carries, METAwkXcqyXKy1AtsSgJ8JiUHwGCafnZL38n3vYmeta. Our November 6, 2026 read shows $90.0 million market cap, $1.2 million of pool liquidity, and 6,762 holders.
The honest read: MetaDAO is one of the genuinely novel governance experiments running — futarchy has decades of academic lineage and this is its most concrete deployment. The token's bet is that governance-by-market out-allocates founder governance; the honest risks are the thin holder count for its market cap and that market-based governance can still be cornered by a deep-pocketed participant.
果蝇
果蝇 — "fruit fly" in Chinese — at 0x209e487f1c2637ddf1f1b3f7d88a19068626b70b is a five-day-old BNB Chain deployment whose headline number demands a second look: 1,815,204 recorded wallets against a market cap of $7.8 thousand and a fully diluted figure of $8 thousand on the November 3, 2026 snapshot.
A holder count that large against a four-figure valuation is the signature of an airdrop-shaped distribution — dust scattered across hundreds of thousands of addresses, not organic demand — and the concentration read agrees: the top ten wallets hold 100% of the supply, so the 1.8 million "holders" carry amounts too small to matter. The tracked book, $5.5 of pool liquidity, is real but thin against the FDV.
FAQ
Which is bigger, META or 果蝇?
By tracked market cap: META (Solana) measures $89.98M and 果蝇 (BNB Chain) measures $7.83K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, META or 果蝇?
On the contract checks we publish: META (Solana) grades A and 果蝇 (BNB Chain) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have META and 果蝇 performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-11-09T21:16:00, the measured snapshots show META at −29.7% and 果蝇 at −100.0%.
More comparisons
META vs QNTONDO vs METAMETA vs LITMORPHO vs META果蝇 vs BNSOL果蝇 vs JITOSOL果蝇 vs JLUSDC果蝇 vs JUPSOL
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-11-09T21:16:00; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.