NexMEBT vs NODAL — price, size and safety, side by side
MEBT (Polygon) vs NODAL (Polygon) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-15 / 2026-11-15.
MEBT vs NODAL — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-11-15T15:15:30
| MEBT | NODAL | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.70 | $0.001893 |
| Market cap | — | $1.10M |
| 24h volume | $62.63K DEX | $972.28 all venues |
| Liquidity | $217.88K | $195.60K |
| FDV | $3.06M | $20.17M |
| Holders | 7,115 | 3,459 |
| Age (days) | 126 | 97 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- MEBT measures ~64× the 24h volume of NODAL
- MEBT measures ~2.1× the holder count of NODAL
What the data says
MEBT
MEBT at 0x99d11bb9bc5f1ee15a817934f33643dee41026d5 is a young Polygon asset — 108 days into its record at the November 4, 2026 snapshot — with 7,115 holders sharing a 1.4 million supply. The snapshot carries no market-cap reading; the book's size is what the pools report.
The contract is the locked kind: mint and freeze authority are both revoked, the contract cannot create new supply, and it is not a proxy — the full clean set on a young deployment. The distribution is the counterweight: the ten largest wallets hold 99.8% of supply, an essentially single-bracket book despite the wide holder count. $217.9 thousand of deep tracked depth sees $114.7 thousand of daily volume — a tape that nearly halves the pool daily.
NODAL
NODAL at 0x1bf6634969eb3877759d31eefe60b974e57a8b28 is a 97-day-old Polygon book priced at a $1.1 million market cap against a $20.2 million fully-diluted figure on 10.0 billion units at the November 6, 2026 snapshot — barely one part in twenty-five of the total claim is priced float.
The book is deep for the cap it currently serves: $195.6 thousand of tracked depth on $35.8 thousand of 24-hour volume. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, MEBT or NODAL?
By tracked market cap: MEBT (Polygon) measures — and NODAL (Polygon) measures $1.10M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, MEBT or NODAL?
On the contract checks we publish: MEBT (Polygon) grades A and NODAL (Polygon) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have MEBT and NODAL performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-11-15T15:15:30, the measured snapshots show MEBT at −44.9% and NODAL at −44.1%.
More comparisons
MEBT vs UVMSOLVBTC vs MEBTICP vs MEBTMEBT vs AAVE.ERENDER vs NODALAAVE.E vs NODALUVM vs NODALNODAL vs GRASS
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-11-15T15:15:30; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.