HostMEBT vs CRV — price, size and safety, side by side
MEBT (Polygon) vs CRV (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-15 / 2026-11-12.
MEBT vs CRV — normalized performance, 2026-09-27 to 2026-11-12T21:16:22
| MEBT | CRV | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.70 | $0.2376 |
| Market cap | — | $416.06M |
| 24h volume | $62.63K DEX | $47.95M all venues |
| Liquidity | $217.88K | $8.70M |
| FDV | $3.06M | $638.63M |
| Holders | 7,115 | 101,017 |
| Age (days) | 126 | 1,105 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- CRV measures ~40× the liquidity of MEBT
- CRV measures ~766× the 24h volume of MEBT
- CRV measures ~14× the holder count of MEBT
- over the shared window MEBT moved −40.4% while CRV moved −30.9%
What the data says
MEBT
MEBT at 0x99d11bb9bc5f1ee15a817934f33643dee41026d5 is a young Polygon asset — 108 days into its record at the November 4, 2026 snapshot — with 7,115 holders sharing a 1.4 million supply. The snapshot carries no market-cap reading; the book's size is what the pools report.
The contract is the locked kind: mint and freeze authority are both revoked, the contract cannot create new supply, and it is not a proxy — the full clean set on a young deployment. The distribution is the counterweight: the ten largest wallets hold 99.8% of supply, an essentially single-bracket book despite the wide holder count. $217.9 thousand of deep tracked depth sees $114.7 thousand of daily volume — a tape that nearly halves the pool daily.
CRV
CRV — Curve DAO Token at 0xd533a949740bb3306d119cc777fa900ba034cd52 — is the governance and incentive token of Curve, the stable-swap AMM that carries a meaningful share of all stablecoin and LST volume on Ethereum. This is a six-year-old protocol token, not a launch, and the honest risks are the ones an established protocol token actually runs: governance economics, emissions, and founder concentration — not honeypot mechanics.
The November 6, 2026 snapshot reads a $416.1 million market cap against an $638.6 million fully-diluted value — roughly two-thirds of eventual supply circulating — with $8.7 million of tracked pool depth and 101,017 holders. Depth at that scale is a real exit book for a retail position.
FAQ
Which is bigger, MEBT or CRV?
By tracked market cap: MEBT (Polygon) measures — and CRV (Ethereum) measures $416.06M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, MEBT or CRV?
On the contract checks we publish: MEBT (Polygon) grades A and CRV (Ethereum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have MEBT and CRV performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-27 and 2026-11-12T21:16:22, the measured snapshots show MEBT at −40.4% and CRV at −30.9%.
More comparisons
MEBT vs UVMSOLVBTC vs MEBTICP vs MEBTMEBT vs AAVE.ECRV vs SKYSUSDAI vs CRVUSDTB vs CRVCRV vs KBTC
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-27→2026-11-12T21:16:22; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.