Open app

MEBT vs CRV — price, size and safety, side by side

MEBT (Polygon) vs CRV (Arbitrum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.

MEBTA

$3.08
MEBT on Polygon
Trade MEBT
vs

CRVB

$0.3519
Curve DAO Token on Arbitrum
Trade CRV

MEBT vs CRV — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-27T15:10:18

100 — shared start
MEBT −0.10%  ·  CRV −2.31% — both series rebased to 100 at the first measured point in the shared window; not a raw-price chart.
MEBTCRV
Price$3.08$0.3519
Market cap$4.23M$552.13M
24h volume$117.54K$130.97K
Liquidity$263.02K$414.92K
FDV$4.20M$6.89M
Holders6,88629,093
Age (days)1081,687
Safety gradeAB

Where they differ

What the data says

MEBT

MEBT at 0x99d11bb9bc5f1ee15a817934f33643dee41026d5 is a young Polygon asset — 108 days into its record at the September 27, 2026 snapshot — with 6,886 holders sharing a 1.4 million supply. The snapshot carries no market-cap reading; the book's size is what the pools report.

The contract is the locked kind: mint and freeze authority are both revoked, the contract cannot create new supply, and it is not a proxy — the full clean set on a young deployment. The distribution is the counterweight: the ten largest wallets hold 99.8% of supply, an essentially single-bracket book despite the wide holder count. $263.0 thousand of deep tracked depth sees $114.7 thousand of daily volume — a tape that nearly halves the pool daily.

Full MEBT safety read →

CRV

CRV at 0x11cdb42b0eb46d95f990bedd4695a6e3fa034978 — Curve DAO Token — is the bridged Arbitrum deployment of the Curve protocol's governance asset, 1,687 days into its record at the September 27, 2026 snapshot. The asset-wide $552.1 million market cap towers over the $6.9 million fully-diluted figure on 19.6 million local units.

The local book is thin against the headline: $414.9 thousand of tracked depth on $291.8 thousand of 24-hour volume — a layer-two slice that moves with flow rather than holding a primary pool. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.

Full CRV safety read →

FAQ

Which is bigger, MEBT or CRV?

By tracked market cap: MEBT (Polygon) measures $4.23M and CRV (Arbitrum) measures $552.13M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.

Which is safer, MEBT or CRV?

On the contract checks we publish: MEBT (Polygon) grades A and CRV (Arbitrum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.

How have MEBT and CRV performed over the shared window?

Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-27T15:10:18, the measured snapshots show MEBT at −0.10% and CRV at −2.31%.

More comparisons

MEBT vs CLAWNES vs MEBTMEBT vs BEEMEBT vs KITTYCRV vs SUPERCRV vs VELVETHIMS vs CRVPRL vs CRV

The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-27T15:10:18; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.

Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.