NexMCA vs MUSD — price, size and safety, side by side
MCA (Monad) vs MUSD (Linea) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-15 / 2026-11-14.
MCA vs MUSD — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-11-14T21:16:23
| MCA | MUSD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.000002269 | $0.9828 |
| Market cap | $3.51K | $37.09M |
| 24h volume | $0.2388 DEX | $16.91K DEX |
| Liquidity | $1.60K | $378.79K |
| FDV | $2.27K | $5.48M |
| Holders | 2,837 | — |
| Age (days) | 298 | 169 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- MUSD measures ~10,568× the market cap of MCA
- MUSD measures ~237× the liquidity of MCA
- MUSD measures ~70,808× the 24h volume of MCA
- over the shared window MCA moved −33.0% while MUSD moved −1.13%
What the data says
MCA
Chewy is one of the smallest viable markets on this index — a Monad meme whose market cap of $4 thousand nearly equals its liquidity pool of $2 thousand. That ratio inverts the usual problem: most thin-pool tokens carry inflated caps on shallow books, but MCA's entire valuation fits inside its own pool. There is almost no distance between the paper value and the exit depth.
The contract is the standard grade-A template at 85/100: no mint, no pause or blacklist, verified source, 298 days old. 2,837 holders spread across a $3.5K cap means the average position is about a dollar — this is a microcap in the literal sense, kept alive by dust-scale distribution.
MUSD
One detail on MUSD didn't fully resolve in the 2026-10-09 snapshot: its contract controls. So rather than assume anything either way, it's worth a direct check, and the scanner above reads it live in a couple of seconds before you trade.
Here's where MUSD stands today: workable liquidity of $417.40K and a maturing record at 169 days as of 2026-10-09. The $417.40K pool against a ~$37.78M cap is a middling ratio — enough for typical trades to clear, but worth respecting if you're trading size. The creator's own position is small — <0.01% of supply as of 2026-10-09, comfortably under the 5% line the scanners flag — which is what you want to see.
FAQ
Which is bigger, MCA or MUSD?
By tracked market cap: MCA (Monad) measures $3.51K and MUSD (Linea) measures $37.09M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, MCA or MUSD?
On the contract checks we publish: MCA (Monad) grades A and MUSD (Linea) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have MCA and MUSD performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-11-14T21:16:23, the measured snapshots show MCA at −33.0% and MUSD at −1.13%.
More comparisons
MCA vs NODAMCA vs BNSOLMCA vs JITOSOLMCA vs JLUSDCMON vs MUSDMUSD vs CRVMUSD vs GOHOMEPYTH vs MUSD
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-11-14T21:16:23; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.