NexLYN vs 牛马 — price, size and safety, side by side
LYN (BNB Chain) vs 牛马 (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-11 / 2026-11-11.
LYN vs 牛马 — normalized performance, 2026-10-06 to 2026-11-11T18:19:14
| LYN | 牛马 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.0196 | $0.00001053 |
| Market cap | $4.61M | $11.58K |
| 24h volume | $4.93M all venues | $2.27K all venues |
| Liquidity | $34.74K | $22.02K |
| FDV | $22.05M | $11.58K |
| Holders | 21,970 | 8,984 |
| Age (days) | 365 | 3 |
| Safety grade | C | C |
Where they differ
- LYN measures ~398× the market cap of 牛马
- LYN measures ~1.6× the liquidity of 牛马
- LYN measures ~2,174× the 24h volume of 牛马
- LYN measures ~2.4× the holder count of 牛马
- over the shared window LYN moved −9.79% while 牛马 moved −43.2%
What the data says
LYN
LYN has one open item that shapes the whole read, so let's start there. The mint function on LYN's contract is still live as of 2026-10-09, which keeps the option open for them to create new supply. Read the rest of the page with that in mind — it's why LYN is at C (67/100) as of 2026-10-09, with real room to improve.
On the trading data, LYN shows workable liquidity of $79.21K, 21,970 holders and an established record at 365 days as of 2026-10-09. The $79.21K pool against a ~$4.51M cap is a middling ratio — enough for typical trades to clear, but worth respecting if you're trading size. 21,970 holders is a decent base; just remember the number alone doesn't reveal how much the top wallets control, so weigh it with the concentration figure. Reassuringly, the wallet that created LYN holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-10-09 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
牛马
牛马 at 0xb077ada375b5e416f15e8b8f6827dadfa53a7777 — a workhorse-slang name on a contract that ends in four sevens — is a three-day-old BNB Chain book priced at a $12 thousand market cap across a 1.0 billion supply at the November 4, 2026 snapshot.
The launch book is deep for the float and the tape is hot: $22.0 thousand of tracked depth on $3.0 million of 24-hour volume — routed flow cycling the pool twenty-seven times daily on day three. No holder distribution and no contract-level controls were assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, LYN or 牛马?
By tracked market cap: LYN (BNB Chain) measures $4.61M and 牛马 (BNB Chain) measures $11.58K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, LYN or 牛马?
On the contract checks we publish: LYN (BNB Chain) grades C and 牛马 (BNB Chain) grades C. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have LYN and 牛马 performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-06 and 2026-11-11T18:19:14, the measured snapshots show LYN at −9.79% and 牛马 at −43.2%.
More comparisons
POL vs LYNTSAT vs LYNLYN vs CAKELYN vs WEETH牛马 vs CAKE牛马 vs WEETH牛马 vs RETH牛马 vs NODA
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-06→2026-11-11T18:19:14; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.